fever95 333 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 (edited) Team Mercenaries Roster Forwards C - Tyler Cote C - Gifford Shock LW - Rami Jakobssen LW - Thomas Duddy RW - Brady Stropko RW - Shawn Muller Defensmen D - Jamie Hill D - Pablo Escabar D - Arcturus Mengsk D - World B. Free Goalies G - Sandro Clegane G - Fedir Okranitz Edited December 29, 2015 by fever95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike 708 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Looks like gold to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Higgins 3,617 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Well the most active team in the tourney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eaglesfan036 4,583 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 I'm pretty sure Team Mercenaries is supposed to be made up of actives.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advantage 2,769 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Free should be there instead of Roy for sure. Roy is barely even an upgrade really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevo 760 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 26 minutes ago, Advantage said: Free should be there instead of Roy for sure. Roy is barely even an upgrade really. My way-too-short 590 quote wasn't about to be taken seriously, was meant to be more of a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advantage 2,769 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 5 minutes ago, stevo said: My way-too-short 590 quote wasn't about to be taken seriously, was meant to be more of a joke. Still, I'd take a 200 TPE active over a 300 TPE inactive any day of the week. Especially a 300 TPE inactive who fits forwards better (his faceoffs is up and he was only moved cause he was an upgrade on what I had on my NY team offensively). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advantage 2,769 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Just to explain my case (and it's not my team so more power to fever, I just would prefer an active to get it if it's close...and for the record I think guys like Stropko are fine on there..I get that). Roy III: TPE - 333 Usable TPE - 303 (Subtracted 30 from him for faceoffs) B. Free: TPE - 224 Usable TPE - 224 Is a 79 TPE difference really worth benching an active over? Hickey hasn't been here since the beginning of June. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevo 760 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 23 minutes ago, Advantage said: Still, I'd take a 200 TPE active over a 300 TPE inactive any day of the week. Especially a 300 TPE inactive who fits forwards better (his faceoffs is up and he was only moved cause he was an upgrade on what I had on my NY team offensively). Well, I'd also love to have some games this next week to look for but it's ok for me to sit out. The team won't get any better with Free and it's fever's team so there's that. Advantage 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLastOlympian07 2,388 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 i made it, i think we get our achievement tracker put into this too, so i should get atleast 300 tpe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fever95 333 Posted December 29, 2015 Author Share Posted December 29, 2015 updated, welcome to the team Free. stevo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fever95 333 Posted December 29, 2015 Author Share Posted December 29, 2015 @stevo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevo 760 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Woo, thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Higgins 3,617 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 6 hours ago, Advantage said: Just to explain my case (and it's not my team so more power to fever, I just would prefer an active to get it if it's close...and for the record I think guys like Stropko are fine on there..I get that). Half this team was cut from Canada, not for a lack of TPE, but being inactive. (Cote, Stropko, Shock, Escabar and Hill) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advantage 2,769 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 (edited) 1 hour ago, Higgins said: Half this team was cut from Canada, not for a lack of TPE, but being inactive. (Cote, Stropko, Shock, Escabar and Hill) Sure and I don't mind guys like Cote, Stropko, etc. being included but when there is a 70 TPE difference between an active and someone who hasn't been here in eight months..I think it should go to the active. I mean, the more actives included the better. But I'm not suggesting benching a 700 TPE guy like Cote for someone with 150 TPE. However, I am glad to see @fever95 made the change. Certainly didn't want to come off as rude or anything..just thought it made sense. Edited December 29, 2015 by Advantage fever95 and Higgins 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JardyB10 4,834 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 WE DID OUR BEST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JardyB10 4,834 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I WILL CARRY US TO GOLD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts