Enorama

This is actually something we have moved away from in a major way since retracting the E to 6 teams. Last season we had 0 inactive veteran players, this year we have two per team because the GMs voted 4-2 that they wanted them this year. I personally think we can be completely healthy with 0. The actual issue with any "delete the E talk" stems from the cap question you mention. We've been over this many times since even before the inauguration of the VHLE, but there basically has to be one of two outcomes here. Either: a)we keep cap at 400 as you suggest, but we don't think there's any appetite for brand new players to play against a good chunk of players at 300+ TPE, or b) we move the cap to 200 or 250 and the VHL supports the excess, but right now the excess is big enough to require either expansion or raising the cap, which comes with it's own issues as well. The long and short of it is as long as there is some form of recruitment effort, deleting the E would most likely require either expansion or forcing new players to play against too strong of opposition early on, neither of which have been at all appealing based on multiple discussions.

am i crazy or does this say walrer

This reads like you thought it in 1999, not 2019

I was REALLY hoping to see by Markus Zusak here

A friend was unjustly

Exactly how I got my second Kobo after the first one I picked up used... took a bath

https://letterboxd.com/enorama/year/2023/ Best of 2023 (includes movies I had to finish in 2024 ) https://letterboxd.com/enorama/list/2023-ranked/

Sounds like you need to join us in

My point exactly, I have 0 incentive to do so. Although I have done sporadic graphics for fun, just haven't posted them on the forum and instead just throw them in LRs or whatever.

· Job Pay

escaping the prairies??? that's allowed???????

Inactive FA becomes active FA by clicking experience, accepts contracts

I believe it was achieved in S85 if that helps at all + been done at least once since then

You wouldn't have to go back further anyways, as there have only been 14 VHLE drafts in league history! Now go and find who was the first to win the Founder's, Renaissance, and Continental cups

back to back to back* and then one two seasons prior, for 4 in the past 5 seasons going into S92

classic (fake) brit

what show do we have a rack of

not a bad idea

Virtuoso is a part of my regular vernacular tyvm

Oh, mighty GustavMattias, virtuoso of the ice, we beseech your unparalleled prowess to grace our humble hockey team with your unparalleled skills. Your name resonates like a hymn in the rinks, echoing tales of unmatched finesse and unrivaled victories. We stand in awe of your sublime talent, envisioning the glory and triumph that would surely follow your esteemed presence on our team. With the grace of a figure skater and the power of a thunderous slap shot, you are the embodiment of hockey excellence. Your stick dances on the puck like a maestro conducting a symphony, leaving opponents in awe and teammates in utter admiration. The very thought of your joining our ranks ignites a fervent flame of hope, as we envision the victories and championships that could be within our grasp. Oh, GustavMattias, we kneel before you, our hearts entwined with the blades you masterfully glide upon. We implore you, with the utmost sincerity and humility, to consider gracing our team with your celestial talent. Join us on this journey, and together, let us etch a legacy of triumph on the icy canvas of the hockey arena. We await your benevolent response, oh hockey deity, with bated breath and unwavering devotion.

Can I vote none of the above? Shepherds and huskies >>>>> ALREADY DONE AND DUSTED

I will not stand for this Discipline slander, don't lump it in with Leadership

My thoughts can basically be summed up on a flow chart. Do you think allowing the meta builds was sustainable and healthy? If yes, we change nothing. If no, you have four options. 1. Change the sim engine -> no real other options available with the import/export options STHS has. 2. Put different update scales for certain attributes -> this would make it glaringly obvious which attributes are just better and would lead to the same problem you see now of not getting any improvement in a full week of earning, but even a step worse because you don't even get to click the button. 3. Institute limits on gaps -> Definitely an option but once again would make it clear that SC > PA is just better, people hate seeing things locked, and the same concept can be effectively enforced by option 4. 4. Hybrid attribute system -> Can essentially accomplish 2 & 3 in the same go but doing it in almost a hidden way, which can be seen as both a positive and a negative. Some of the same downsides as both 2 & 3 of course.

Ah you mean more talk relative to now vs. more talk relative to each other. That's fair. Warsaw has a cup under it's belt so I think part of the discourse is that it did achieve highs and just fell hard while LA has never really been up there. NYA kinda falls in the LA basket as well in that neither team has been good for over a decade so it feels like punching down to make fun.