.sniffuM

5

Looking forward to throwing my sigs in the ring next season.

+1

+1

I demand to be traded back to Vancouver so I can hold out on Beaviss and force him to trade me back to Davos.

+10

But when you're directly competing with less teams for less playoff spots it's more likely to happen.

I figured you (and Spade) would be the most opposed. I'm not saying it's necessarily a problem, but it could create problems for sure. Especially with how incredibly competitive the league is now, if you're directly competing with a smaller pool of teams for less playoff spots (again, assuming conferences is gonna be a thing again) any one player can be the edge. That can lead to GMs nor updating or doing tasks for their second player if they're on a rival team, which isn't something that can really be policed. All in all I just think it's something to keep in mind, but I could see GMs that tend to be more about GMing than player careers choosing to eschew having a second player if it is guaranteed to only benefit another team.

Gotchu fam.

Mind you I haven't been in tune with anything in a couple weeks, but if the plan is to move back to conferences I think that's a good point to start considering eliminating the second player for GMs. I know some GMs would be very opposed to this but teams being in more direct competition with specific other teams makes this untenable imo. It would suck to be a GM pushing for a playoff spot and missing out where another team in your conference having your other player is a factor.

uno

5

fresco cresco

Might be what it was. Still makes a player a bust at least from the team's perspective.