.sniffuM

Updaters
  • Content Count

    2,495
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

.sniffuM last won the day on October 20 2018

.sniffuM had the most liked content!

About .sniffuM

  • Rank
    AKA Dennis, Crit, or BBD

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3,604 profile views
  1. Looking forward to throwing my sigs in the ring next season.
  2. .sniffuM

    VAN/DAV: S66

    I demand to be traded back to Vancouver so I can hold out on Beaviss and force him to trade me back to Davos.
  3. But when you're directly competing with less teams for less playoff spots it's more likely to happen.
  4. I figured you (and Spade) would be the most opposed. I'm not saying it's necessarily a problem, but it could create problems for sure. Especially with how incredibly competitive the league is now, if you're directly competing with a smaller pool of teams for less playoff spots (again, assuming conferences is gonna be a thing again) any one player can be the edge. That can lead to GMs nor updating or doing tasks for their second player if they're on a rival team, which isn't something that can really be policed. All in all I just think it's something to keep in mind, but I could see GMs that tend to be more about GMing than player careers choosing to eschew having a second player if it is guaranteed to only benefit another team.
  5. Mind you I haven't been in tune with anything in a couple weeks, but if the plan is to move back to conferences I think that's a good point to start considering eliminating the second player for GMs. I know some GMs would be very opposed to this but teams being in more direct competition with specific other teams makes this untenable imo. It would suck to be a GM pushing for a playoff spot and missing out where another team in your conference having your other player is a factor.
  6. Might be what it was. Still makes a player a bust at least from the team's perspective.