Senior Admin Will 4,660 Posted December 2, 2016 Senior Admin Share Posted December 2, 2016 SUMMARY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluObieZ 1,125 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Ummm ouch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissioner Beketov 9,021 Posted December 3, 2016 Commissioner Share Posted December 3, 2016 Much better, would have liked to get a shutout on only 17 shots but I'll take a good team win. GG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregreg 930 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Revenge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 5,119 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 REVENGE OF DABEARS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FacePuncher 1,343 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Rektttttttttttt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Well first real loss of the season for us. Well played Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 8,042 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 1-1 today. Not too shabby! First game was meh, maybe some bad defense or something by us that game. Liking this one though. Good game day NYA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoop 3,425 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 45 minutes ago, Mr. Power said: Well first real loss of the season for us. Well played Seattle. Dunno wtf you're talking about this is our third loss. Just because the other two were against teams that we "should've" beat doesn't mean that they weren't real. BOOM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evrydayimbyfuglien 600 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Streetlight said: Dunno wtf you're talking about this is our third loss. Just because the other two were against teams that we "should've" beat doesn't mean that they weren't real. Says you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 59 minutes ago, Streetlight said: Dunno wtf you're talking about this is our third loss. Just because the other two were against teams that we "should've" beat doesn't mean that they weren't real. Should of beat wasn't my determining factor. We hilariously out shot Davos and Quebec and their goalies kept them alive and stole games, welcome to the league that happens. We still outplayed them. Where as we were out played here and lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 It's important @Streetlight to not stress about the things you can't control. No matter what we do with lines our roster performed good in the DAV Quebec games we lost/were close. This is at least a justifiable story and not just a goalie keeping his team in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoop 3,425 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Just now, Mr. Power said: Should of beat wasn't my determining factor. We hilariously out shot Davos and Quebec and their goalies kept them alive and stole games, welcome to the league that happens. We still outplayed them. Where as we were out played here and lost. Why do you keep saying this shit as if the goalies are not part of the game? "Oh we lost because their goalies played better so it's not a real loss!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoop 3,425 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Mr. Power said: It's important @Streetlight to not stress about the things you can't control. No matter what we do with lines our roster performed good in the DAV Quebec games we lost/were close. This is at least a justifiable story and not just a goalie keeping his team in the game. If we had performed well against Davos and Quebec we would've scored more than five goals over four games against those trash teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Come on Street your reading into my use of the word real far too much here. You know what I mean. I can't control when a CPU goalie decides to play out of this world. You run 1000 sims of an elite team vs a trash team with a 200+ TPE goalie and your going to get gamez where the goalie outperforms expectations and shines. The losses I'm concerned about are the ones I may be able to fix, like this one for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FacePuncher 1,343 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 51 minutes ago, Streetlight said: Why do you keep saying this shit as if the goalies are not part of the game? "Oh we lost because their goalies played better so it's not a real loss!" I think he's just trying to be reassuring man..... Devise 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLastOlympian07 2,388 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 who mad. Street mad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedgehog337 3,483 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOOM 8,738 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 4 hours ago, TheLastOlympian07 said: who mad. Street mad Whose house.... Runs house. TheLastOlympian07 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 13 hours ago, Mr. Power said: Come on Street your reading into my use of the word real far too much here. You know what I mean. I can't control when a CPU goalie decides to play out of this world. You run 1000 sims of an elite team vs a trash team with a 200+ TPE goalie and your going to get gamez where the goalie outperforms expectations and shines. The losses I'm concerned about are the ones I may be able to fix, like this one for example. Although evidenced by the fact that we outshoot them and beat them 3-1 in one game, and then the out shoot and us and beat us 7-1 in another, it's more likely that both teams are close in terms of actual roster strength and we aren't able to use our depth advantage on them as we are on a team like Toronto nearly as much. Due to that, you get mixed sim results. I'm sure Seattle would of rather had two wins here instead of a loss to us in such decisive fashion as well. You win some, you lose some. Welcome to STHS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STZ 5,357 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Why is everyone overlooking my backflip no look 360 goal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now