STZ 5,280 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 VHL Magazine - Edition 321 Corco and Da Trifecta 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Trifecta 1,896 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Great work here gents. Especially @Devise Devise 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Sorry I'll take up less pages next time. Blame @BOOM I just had to do 3 paragraphs with his talking points. STZ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Also great job and good reads everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Admin Will 4,604 Posted March 3, 2017 Senior Admin Share Posted March 3, 2017 To whomever made that Jarvi image: You are a beast. STZ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOOM 8,401 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 1 hour ago, Devise said: Sorry I'll take up less pages next time. Blame @BOOM I just had to do 3 paragraphs with his talking points. Next time I'll just ask you what type of flower you would be! First the board issue and now this. I can't win with you poopheads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STZ 5,280 Posted March 3, 2017 Author Share Posted March 3, 2017 8 hours ago, Will said: To whomever made that Jarvi image: You are a beast. I had such a better vision for it.. I thought it looked like shit lol it was late so I just said fuck it lol. Thanks tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLastOlympian07 2,388 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 good job guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanesEuntDomus 442 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 I haven't been very active with my current player but I still really enjoying reading the mag, so good work guys :). Some very interesting discussions and articles recently, like the one about getting rid of juniors. I'm obviously not as informed as the super actives around here but if you are interested in my opinion, it would be that we shouldn't get rid of the VHLM altogether, but that the league needs major, radical reforms. I'm not sure about specifics but I was thinking of something along the lines of cutting the league down to 4-5 teams as well as changes in VHLM eligibility and TPE-management. The goal would be to get as many rookies and young players as possible together in just a few locker rooms, who are really active and excited about going nose-to-nose with other teams who are just as active, providing them with plenty of ice-time while high-TPE recreates (who usually aren't very interested in the league anyway) and veteran inactives get forced out sooner so that they don't dominate the scoreboards. Again, I might be totally off base here but those sound like good things to strive for to me, at least in theory. Also, I bought a magazine feature in the Player Store last seaon, I guess this hasn't been registered so far so is there another place where I have to post that purchase :)? stevo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 ^Was an SHL HO member, take opinion lightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanesEuntDomus 442 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Kendrick said: ^Was an SHL HO member, take opinion lightly. Uhm... Okay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevo 760 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) I think this is a fair suggestion. I mean honestly, who wants to see a junior league team with no single player on their roster? That's kinda odd to me. Edited March 3, 2017 by stevo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 1 hour ago, stevo said: I think this is a fair suggestion. I mean honestly, who wants to see a junior league team with no single player on their roster? That's kinda odd to me. Yeah but at what point do we eliminate all forms of competent competition just to ensure all the players play together? Wouldn't we accomplish that exact same feat if we removed the VHLM, except we'd you know, keep a larger amount of competitive teams and actually allow GM's to do their jobs and build winners. That is the thing, at a certain point a smaller VHLM turns into rando simulator. Why trade? Why make big moves? The rosters are likely going to be full, stay full. I get that people want that for competition sake so that new members coming into the league aren't so divided from other members. But again I say, doesn't getting rid of the VHLM do that exact same thing? It doesn't matter how much people argue this, 80% of the league pays way more attention to the VHL. Getting new members more TPE to join us in the VHL is nothing but a more united league. I have yet to see a valid counter argument to that fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotAVHLM-GM 1,858 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Robbie's suggestion was good. Where is the controversy man? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanesEuntDomus 442 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 1 hour ago, Devise said: Yeah but at what point do we eliminate all forms of competent competition just to ensure all the players play together? Wouldn't we accomplish that exact same feat if we removed the VHLM, except we'd you know, keep a larger amount of competitive teams and actually allow GM's to do their jobs and build winners. That is the thing, at a certain point a smaller VHLM turns into rando simulator. Why trade? Why make big moves? The rosters are likely going to be full, stay full. I get that people want that for competition sake so that new members coming into the league aren't so divided from other members. But again I say, doesn't getting rid of the VHLM do that exact same thing? It doesn't matter how much people argue this, 80% of the league pays way more attention to the VHL. Getting new members more TPE to join us in the VHL is nothing but a more united league. I have yet to see a valid counter argument to that fact. Getting rid of the VHLM could work for sure, the GOMHL is doing just fine without a junior league but then again, their TPE-structure is quite different. I'd just prefer to salvage the situation instead of giving up on the VHLM, but if the league has concluded that it is unsalvageable at this point then a clear cut would indeed be the best solution. Regarding my suggestion, I don't think that it would turn the VHLM into a random simulator, smart drafting and good player development would still matter, probably even more so than it does today if we phase out higher TPE inactives. We'd obviously have to find the right balance so that rosters are decently big, but not completely full. If that means having 4 teams would be better or 6, or if a good roster size is two full lines or three is something that people with a better knowledge of the situation and the numbers would have to answer. It is something that could work though in my opinion, as it would promote both activity and competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLastOlympian07 2,388 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Just now, RomanesEuntDomus said: Getting rid of the VHLM could work for sure, the GOMHL is doing just fine without a junior league but then again, their TPE-structure is quite different. I'd just prefer to salvage the situation instead of giving up on the VHLM, but if the league has concluded that it is unsalvageable at this point then a clear cut would indeed be the best solution. Regarding my suggestion, I don't think that it would turn the VHLM into a random simulator, smart drafting and good player development would still matter, probably even more so than it does today if we phase out higher TPE inactives. We'd obviously have to find the right balance so that rosters are decently big, but not completely full. If that means having 4 teams would be better or 6, or if a good roster size is two full lines or three is something that people with a better knowledge of the situation and the numbers would have to answer. It is something that could work though in my opinion, as it would promote both activity and competition. this guy gets it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorlab 4,321 Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 that jarvi artwork is crackkkkkkkkkkk STZ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STZ 5,280 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Share Posted March 4, 2017 19 hours ago, RomanesEuntDomus said: Also, I bought a magazine feature in the Player Store last seaon, I guess this hasn't been registered so far so is there another place where I have to post that purchase :)? Unless you are okay with it just being Fan Art Page I'd get a refund - because it's hard enough finding enough content, period, I can't even imagine the struggle to get a featured player article done.. I do the fan art tho, and I can do your player next edition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanesEuntDomus 442 Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 42 minutes ago, STZ said: Unless you are okay with it just being Fan Art Page I'd get a refund - because it's hard enough finding enough content, period, I can't even imagine the struggle to get a featured player article done.. I do the fan art tho, and I can do your player next edition Your call, just wanted to make sure that it wasn't forgotten. Doesn't need to happen right now or anything like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gudnason 607 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 Is this where I put my lottery numbers? If so, 5-2-4 thanks. Da Trifecta 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Trifecta 1,896 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 16 minutes ago, punkhippie said: Is this where I put my lottery numbers? If so, 5-2-4 thanks. It sure is Gudnason 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gudnason 607 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, Da Trifecta said: It sure is Alright just making sure because it seems like nobody has posted any numbers in this forum for the past little while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Trifecta 1,896 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 4 minutes ago, punkhippie said: Alright just making sure because it seems like nobody has posted any numbers in this forum for the past little while Most people have their set numbers from previous attempts. Your number sticks for as long as the VHL lasts. Some may not know about it or just don't care. Otherwise the number is already in the magazine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gudnason 607 Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 10 minutes ago, Da Trifecta said: Most people have their set numbers from previous attempts. Your number sticks for as long as the VHL lasts. Some may not know about it or just don't care. Otherwise the number is already in the magazine. Oh damn stuck for life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASIANBOUBABI 173 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Can I please have 2-4-1 as my number in the magazine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now