Admin Victor 10,536 Posted April 15, 2018 Admin Share Posted April 15, 2018 5 hours ago, Beketov said: First Finals Champion - Devon Marlow-Marta Trophy: Helsinki Titans Second Finals Champion - Terence Fong Trophy: Seattle Bears I will continue to maintain that these awards are now dumb, outdated and need to be retired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissioner Beketov 8,642 Posted April 15, 2018 Author Commissioner Share Posted April 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, Victor said: I will continue to maintain that these awards are now dumb, outdated and need to be retired. A fair opinion but obviously people predicted them this season so they needed to be awarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,536 Posted April 15, 2018 Admin Share Posted April 15, 2018 13 minutes ago, Beketov said: A fair opinion but obviously people predicted them this season so they needed to be awarded. You can still award prediction points for them, just get rid of the 'award'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooningitup 1,290 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 10 minutes ago, Victor said: You can still award prediction points for them, just get rid of the 'award'. May i ask why? NHL hands out an award for coming out on top and making it to the finals why shouldnt we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Symmetrik 102 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, Gooningitup said: May i ask why? NHL hands out an award for coming out on top and making it to the finals why shouldnt we? They award teams for winning conferences, not for making the finals. Victor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,536 Posted April 15, 2018 Admin Share Posted April 15, 2018 ^ exactly that I don't know if one of the two has been designated for the runners-up but if so it is literally just a losers award. If not, what logic is there to it at all? Also historically one was NA and EU, now anyone appears to be able to win either one so what's the meaning? Fine with people predicting who the finalists are, and in fact fine with there being some recognition for the runners-up - even if it just a mention on the Continental Cup. But awards for 'finalist 1 and 2' should go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Symmetrik 102 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 3 hours ago, Beketov said: Unintentionally perhaps. Most improved is always a pain to do nominations for. I felt like I could have had it a few years and didn’t receive a nomination; it happens. It;s just lame because there's a bunch of tpe involved, and I had a much bigger improvement that the others. It's not really an award you can get a 2nd chance at either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Admin Will 4,604 Posted April 15, 2018 Senior Admin Share Posted April 15, 2018 @Beketov just an FYI you're missing DeGrath as the first winner of the Greg Clegane Trophy in OP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissioner Beketov 8,642 Posted April 15, 2018 Author Commissioner Share Posted April 15, 2018 Just now, Will said: @Beketov just an FYI you're missing DeGrath as the first winner of the Greg Clegane Trophy in OP Thank you, I knew something was missing, forgot to add that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushito 1,945 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Most improved. Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now