Sign in to follow this  
VHL Bot

DAV/VAN; S67 off-season

Recommended Posts

HC Davos receives:

S68 RIG 4th

S69 VAN 3rd


Vancouver receives:

Don Draper

Konstantin Mulligan

Pekka Pouta

Virgil Ligriv

Wrike Chyrnoble

S68 VAN 1st



This trade has been accepted by all parties and is pending league approval.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be the first to admit that I got taken through the ringer on this one, but I really needed a deal to be done and this was the best deal i could get 😕

 

@Snussu @Infernal I'm sad to see you guys go :( You were here for quite some time and it's definitely unfortunate it had to happen this way, but the ugly truth is that i couldn't afford to give you guys much time this season, and so i dealt you guys to vancouver where hopefully you get the playing time you deserve. Good luck boys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ShawnGlade said:

taken through the ringer on this one

 

7 minutes ago, VHL Bot said:

HC Davos receives:

S68 RIG 4th

S69 VAN 3rd

 

Vancouver receives:

 

S68 VAN 1st

 

Even without the players that's and understatement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, VHL Bot said:

S68 VAN 1st

what the fuck.

 

so davos is trading 2 decent prospects, a mediocre player, some goalies, and a 1st for a 3rd and a 4th?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nykonax said:

what the fuck.

 

so davos is trading 2 decent prospects, a mediocre player, some goalies, and a 1st for a 3rd and a 4th?

we traded 2 inactive goalies, 2 pending FAs, and a backup goalie and a 1st to clear up cap space.......which we are now under the cap

 

 

so yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ShawnGlade said:

we traded 2 inactive goalies, 2 pending FAs, and a backup goalie and a 1st to clear up cap space.......which we are now under the cap

 

 

so yes

but why the 1st

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rayzor_7 said:

Yes

im not sure you do

 

we were over the cap, and these were all the players we could afford to trade.......am i just supposed to be over the cap and call it good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nykonax said:

what the fuck.

 

so davos is trading 2 decent prospects, a mediocre player, some goalies, and a 1st for a 3rd and a 4th?

Cap space, Davos is only 250k under cap and that's before they need to resign Thompson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nykonax said:

but why the 1st

again, GMs WILL NOT (and any vhl gm will confirm this) that unless they get something worthwhile from it, they wont do the deal. theres literally no point in taking another team's cap just to be nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ShawnGlade said:

again, GMs WILL NOT (and any vhl gm will confirm this) that unless they get something worthwhile from it, they wont do the deal. theres literally no point in taking another team's cap just to be nice

can't you just release them and pay half the cap hit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ShawnGlade said:

again, GMs WILL NOT (and any vhl gm will confirm this) that unless they get something worthwhile from it, they wont do the deal. theres literally no point in taking another team's cap just to be nice

Yep

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ShawnGlade said:

thats a good response to me destroying the point you were trying to make

sure if you want to call it that, i was just wondering why the 1st was in there, and you were getting shit back. Shawn and bad trades, name a better duo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nykonax said:

sure if you want to call it that, i was just wondering why the 1st was in there, and you were getting shit back. Shawn and bad trades, name a better duo

Dahlberg and disappointing seasons (besides S65 though, thanks for going off in fantasy for me that year)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.