VHL Bot 2,759 Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 Yukon receives: S71 YUK 1st Minnesota receives: S71 MIN 1st S72 YUK 2nd S73 YUK 2nd S73 YUK 4th This trade has been accepted by all parties and is pending league approval. Jubo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonziGG 1,065 Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh wut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McWolf 3,111 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 @MexicanCow123 stop giving Rayz all your picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanCow123 894 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 hour ago, McWolf said: @MexicanCow123 stop giving Rayz all your picks I wanted a top 5 pick. I had to pay a lot to get one. JeffD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McWolf 3,111 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 8 minutes ago, MexicanCow123 said: I wanted a top 5 pick. I had to pay a lot to get one. but you had the pick like a month ago. You've been shopping it for literally the whole season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanCow123 894 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, McWolf said: but you had the pick like a month ago. You've been shopping it for literally the whole season Well I'm smart ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jubo 1,839 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 4 minutes ago, MexicanCow123 said: I wanted a top 5 pick. I had to pay a lot to get one. I'll offer my two cents, take it for what you want. When it comes to a players the VHLM, first round picks are very temporary advantages at best. The VHLM is capped at 250, so 2nd and even 3rd round picks can cap out by the playoffs, and if they dont, you have them for the next season as well and can continue to be competitive. This is a fantastic trade for Minnesota and I'd even venture as far to say should be considered for veto. a_Ferk, JeffD, fonziGG and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanCow123 894 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Jubo07 said: I'll offer my two cents, take it for what you want. When it comes to a players the VHLM, first round picks are very temporary advantages at best. The VHLM is capped at 250, so 2nd and even 3rd round picks can cap out by the playoffs, and if they dont, you have them for the next season as well and can continue to be competitive. This is a fantastic trade for Minnesota and I'd even venture as far to say should be considered for veto. He wouldn't even take off the dam 4th. I tired my best but he wouldn't budge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonziGG 1,065 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 (edited) 54 minutes ago, MexicanCow123 said: He wouldn't even take off the dam 4th. I tired my best but he wouldn't budge. I think the advice I’m going to provide now is that at the end of the day, the onus is on you to set your own limits. If he doesn’t budge, you walk away. You’ve got to have a spine in trade negotiations or else you’re going to get shredded at the same level again. This trade SHOULD be veto’d but who knows anymore? edit: I just want to see you succeed so don’t mind my harshness. Edited March 13, 2020 by fonziGG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaximus 1,045 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 12 minutes ago, fonziGG said: This trade SHOULD be veto’d but who knows anymore? While I agree that this is a horrible trade, it makes a little more sense when you look at the previous trade between them, https://vhlforum.com/topic/77719-yukmin-s70/ This trade is basically YUK getting their original pick back and YUK paying MIN a penalty for changing their mind and wanting their original pick back. I think the only time a trade should be veto'd is if someone is blatantly trying to throw the outcome of a season or if there were rules broken in the trade. I don't think that is the case here, so it should not be veto'd. Rayzor_7 and a_Ferk 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McWolf 3,111 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, DMaximus said: I think the only time a trade should be veto'd is if someone is blatantly trying to throw the outcome of a season or if there were rules broken in the trade. I don't think that is the case here, so it should not be veto'd. That. We all agree it's a bad trade, but we gotta let people make mistakes themselves, don't offer them a safe net to catch their mistakes before they make it. Rayzor_7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonziGG 1,065 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 51 minutes ago, DMaximus said: While I agree that this is a horrible trade, it makes a little more sense when you look at the previous trade between them, https://vhlforum.com/topic/77719-yukmin-s70/ This trade is basically YUK getting their original pick back and YUK paying MIN a penalty for changing their mind and wanting their original pick back. I think the only time a trade should be veto'd is if someone is blatantly trying to throw the outcome of a season or if there were rules broken in the trade. I don't think that is the case here, so it should not be veto'd. Yeah maybe I was a bit over the top with calling for a veto but that’s an insane return for one pick. yikes Rayzor_7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dil 1,744 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 I’m sorry what the fuck fonziGG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanCow123 894 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 After the draft I'll tell you guys why I made the trade. I think it might make it a bit better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissioner Acydburn 1,555 Posted March 13, 2020 Commissioner Share Posted March 13, 2020 4 hours ago, DMaximus said: While I agree that this is a horrible trade, it makes a little more sense when you look at the previous trade between them, https://vhlforum.com/topic/77719-yukmin-s70/ This trade is basically YUK getting their original pick back and YUK paying MIN a penalty for changing their mind and wanting their original pick back. I think the only time a trade should be veto'd is if someone is blatantly trying to throw the outcome of a season or if there were rules broken in the trade. I don't think that is the case here, so it should not be veto'd. I agree, if the case was we were vetoing because of obviously one sided trades a lot of the trades last season would have been reversed. DMaximus and fonziGG 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now