Jump to content

Gudnason

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,379

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Gudnason last won the day on October 4 2017

Gudnason had the most liked content!

Reputation

607 Big Brain

See reputation activity

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Single Status Update

See all updates by Gudnason

  1. Gudnason

    Now that I'm all happy optimistic and high looks like what I did yesterday was stupid as fuck. Stupid as in I went too far and crossed some lines. But that troll was asking to be fed. And he makes himself an easy target cuz there's a big for sale sign hanging from his fly. And he has a carticacture face. Wow that's a big word for a ESL like me. Ok punkhippie out I shall start on my coursework because I have big ambitions this time and taking uni quite seriously

    1. Show previous comments  14 more
    2. DollarAndADream

      DollarAndADream

      Well, nah. He was the runner up for the MVP in 2003, while winning the Ted Lindsay in 2003. Ted Lindsay is the award for most outstanding player.

      In 2004 Moore was headhunting him, knowing he was the Canucks best player and only chance in the playoffs.

      This elbow on Steve Moore was the reason Bertuzzi headhunted Moore in their next game against each other.

       

      But nobody talks about that, and they always talk about Bertuzzi's punch.

    3. Gudnason

      Gudnason

      Wait, Naslund was the Canucks' only hope? So Morrison, Bertuzzi, the Sedins, Matt Cooke, Ohlund, Jovanovski, Sami Salo... they were all shit? I know Dan Cloutier was shit and Alex Auld was Threencarnac like at times, but lol were the Canucks that bad?

    4. DollarAndADream

      DollarAndADream

      Naslund was the leading point scorer for multiple seasons and the main reason they were as good as they were. Sure, Morrison and Bertuzzi were great as well, but not nearly as great without Naslund on that line. The Sedins weren't the great All-Stars they turned later in their careers yet, they were like 40-50 point 2nd liners. Matt Cooke was good but he was more of a checker that could hit. They had great defense as well, but without Naslund there was a clear offensive threat being absent.

×
×
  • Create New...