Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Effort: 2/2 - I'll give it to you, but it was close.

 

Look: 1.5/3 - Going with this so someone else can decide which way it goes. I'm not a fan of this at all, the lighting isn't very good nor is the text. There isn't any blending and very little stock work to speak of outside of the background. The colours of the render and the background don't mix very well together either.

 

Creativity: 1/1 - Sure.

 

Overall: 4.5/6

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-36579
Share on other sites

You need to grow up. You're not going to get an auto 6/6 just because you use Illustrator instead of Photoshop, it's not fair to everyone else who is making better sigs.

im not disputing nor have I ever expected to get a 6/6, I've told that to many people. I expect 4.5-5 but what I'm not happy about is the disrespectful comments you posted.

If I need to grow up then you need to stop being such graphic snob.

Edited by Wastlund
Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-36740
Share on other sites

im not disputing nor have I ever expected to get a 6/6, I've told that to many people. I expect 4.5-5 but what I'm not happy about is the disrespectful comments you posted.

If I need to grow up then you need to stop being such graphic snob.

 

I fail to see what in my grade was "disrespectful". I feel the background is too simplistic, but it was just enough that I gave you the full mark. Anything after that was brought on by you.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-36741
Share on other sites

I fail to see what in my grade was "disrespectful". I feel the background is too simplistic, but it was just enough that I gave you the full mark. Anything after that was brought on by you.

I'll return to my original statement. You clearly don't know the difference between Illustrator and Photoshop. Besides the render, which had numerous edits to make the jersey change and the lighting which isn't exactly the easiest thing to do in AI. And the original one piece background which has atleast 18 different drawn stocks over it as well. "Barely getting my effort" when I spend over 5-6 hours on one sig is a disrespectful thing to say.
Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-36744
Share on other sites

The background looks incredibly simplistic to me. You got the mark, don't complain.

This is probably where he got the notion you were being disrespectful. It's one thing to think it but to tell someone not to complain before they got a given mark is another thing. He has the right to dispute it, whether it goes through or not. However, if a member feels the graders are out to get him or simply "tilt their heads up" when a graphic isn't as good as others done with a different program, thats a tad harsh. I agree, this sig isn't worthy of a 5 and I'm sure Wastlund does too, but no need to speak about "these two morons" like that.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-36752
Share on other sites

I'll return to my original statement. You clearly don't know the difference between Illustrator and Photoshop. Besides the render, which had numerous edits to make the jersey change and the lighting which isn't exactly the easiest thing to do in AI. And the original one piece background which has atleast 18 different drawn stocks over it as well. "Barely getting my effort" when I spend over 5-6 hours on one sig is a disrespectful thing to say.

 

I was unaware whether or not you made the JC yourself, but I assumed you did and that's why you got the 2/2. My issue on effort is what I perceived to be a simple looking background. I don't have access to the PSD or Illustrator file. As for your comment on the time it took, how exactly do you expect me to know that?

 

 

This is probably where he got the notion you were being disrespectful. It's one thing to think it but to tell someone not to complain before they got a given mark is another thing. He has the right to dispute it, whether it goes through or not. However, if a member feels the graders are out to get him or simply "tilt their heads up" when a graphic isn't as good as others done with a different program, thats a tad harsh. I agree, this sig isn't worthy of a 5 and I'm sure Wastlund does too, but no need to speak about "these two morons" like that.

 

Whatever you say, Kendrick.

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-36796
Share on other sites

Effort: 2/2 - No doubt, drawn background and JC

Look: 1.5/3 - It doesn't look very good imo.  The background is nicely done, but the lighting is not good, and the JC stands out.  The render also doesn't blend too well.  

Creativity: 1/1 - Yeah

 

 

Total: 4.5/6

 

FINAL: 4.5/6->5/6

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/4605-claimedn-lindberg/#findComment-37335
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...