boubabi

perma banned for triple post

This is the oldest thing in the book. Multiple tests have been tried and nothing works with the current VHL's standard/history. It just won't happen

damn, this thread has more posts than the entire league in a week you missed me euh

the only solution

I got banned when trying to find a solution to that so no thank you

dem sophomore curses

it's like saying, 7 goaltenders (out of 8 starters) were above 0.910 save pct. so skye's .933 isn't good if you don't give value to numbers, it's useless arguing about that

It's a dead end. I'm outta here

You still believe your 2nd line theory euh ?

that makes little to no sense. It just means the sim is broken. 120 pts means 120 pts

Value is relative. You might be sticked with the 120 point thing, but in the end 3 players reached 110pts +, which is the top percentile

the new league's slogan

1 week actually

A defensemen will always be overlooked because we can't clearly see his defensive contribution in the sim (as we can't see takeaway/giveaway and such) That's just a limitation we have to agree on

hold up, I need to create a coalition with my locker room to make that happen i'M JOKING AGAIN, ALRIGHT

However JRuutu, you must be forgetting that every players have 99 endurance. That can make them play a full 30 minutes. With that, 2 lines of F and 2 lines of D should get you a full icetime of ''real players'' but hey, I'm just sayin

I guess you might be joking, but considering we had 2 pages over Skye, I won't take any chances. 1st pair D and 2nd Pair D are likely going to have the same ice time as they can play 30 minutes each (if you GM setup correctly your lines). And your pts and contribution pct are too low to be considered BUT OKAY, I GOT IT, IT WAS A JOKE

Keller was playing in a sucky sucky team who had a huge gap with their best and 2nd best player Helsinki had some good players in Rudolp, Ay Ay Ron and Shephard. That's the difference

Anyway, I think 2 pages was enough to deconstruct his argument politely.

Looking forward for JRuutu's perma ban. OKAY, i'M JOKING ALRIGHT COOL IT

Again, don't bring your vendetta against the 2 lines concept here. It's useless and irrelevant. A 120 pts season is relative to other players and other seasons. That's how we know if it's good or bad. Again, I've calculated the pts contribution for the players, and I would also say that a 66% points contribution is very very very good.

If you've read my article completely, you would see cornerstone's contribution to the team and you would say : ''Yes, a 120 pts player can make a bad team go good''

The real discussion should be if you agree or not with how I interpret someone's contribution to his team, because ultimately, that's how I think the award should be evaluated on. I think a healthy mix of personal stats/team success is interesting and the numbers that I brought are showing that.

I really don't know how you don't find those thing impressive. At this point, you are bringing personal judgement with nothing to prove your point to the table. I don't thinks that's healthy to the discussion/argument

Because understanding the sim engine is key to stats interpretation. Past GK winners had superior wins, superior save pct and lower GAA. I'm not saying those were exactly 100% correct choices, but I don't see how skye had a ''stellar season'' and ''carried'' his team. Maybe he got them 15 wins, okay, but again, that's arguable considering there was some weaker teams. I don't think this whole Skye talk is necessary as we can all agree it wasn't a MVP worthy season. However JRuutu, you can still try to prove me (and all others) how skye's season was more MVP worthy than cornerstone's and moon's season