Wasty 566 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/28260-pavel-komarov-reviewed/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooningitup 1,290 Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Just saw this thanks !!! Wasty 1 Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/28260-pavel-komarov-reviewed/#findComment-312327 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack 498 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Colouring and lighting is great, as is the overall look. Only thing I'd change is the text. Main font might look a bit better as a full opacity off-white, and with the subtext I would have spaced it out a bit more and maybe blurred the right side. Great sig overall though. Wasty 1 Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/28260-pavel-komarov-reviewed/#findComment-312893 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissioner Beketov 9,095 Posted February 22, 2016 Commissioner Share Posted February 22, 2016 The red feels a tad bit too strong for my liking, washes out any of the other effects you might have. Lighting is strong and nice which I like. I agree about the text, generally you don't want to mess with opacity on your main text, only on subtext or depth text. Get that at full opacity and drop the opacity on the subtext maybe so it stands out less. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/28260-pavel-komarov-reviewed/#findComment-314063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now