Dmoushey_31 106 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 DollarAndADream 1 Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/33279-parechkin-22/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
.sniffuM 1,741 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Feedback: Pretty simple sig here, could use more going on in the background. The sig is too dark, mainly at the edges but in the center as well. The text could use better font choice and the lighting on it draws the eye away from the render which should be the main focus here most of the time. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/33279-parechkin-22/#findComment-369020 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.sniffuM 1,741 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Feedback: Pretty simple sig here, could use more going on in the background. The sig is too dark, mainly at the edges but in the center as well. The text could use better font choice and the lighting on it draws the eye away from the render which should be the main focus here most of the time. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/33279-parechkin-22/#findComment-369021 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissioner Beketov 9,095 Posted September 25, 2016 Commissioner Share Posted September 25, 2016 This whole sig looks very washed out and under-exposed. Play around with exposure and curves layers to really make some stuff pop. As mentioned the BG is a little dull and overall everything feels very dreary. Text is a decent idea but needs to be more of a focal point then it is and I'd like to see some of the blue elements from it throughout the piece so they don't feel as random. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/33279-parechkin-22/#findComment-376277 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts