Claimed: Vodka [2/2]

[Pandar 302]

 

@fruitcake

[fruitcake 3]

That's dope. Thank you

[.sniffuM 1,741]

Review

 

Not bad. I like the background work on the right side, the left could use some more to it though. The lighting could be better, and I[m not a fan of the second render on the left side. The text could also use some more work, looks kinda slapped on there cuz.

[Pandar 302]

On 11/27/2017 at 12:49 AM, .sniffuM said:

Review

 

Not bad. I like the background work on the right side, the left could use some more to it though. The lighting could be better, and I[m not a fan of the second render on the left side. The text could also use some more work, looks kinda slapped on there cuz.

 

Yeah, I'm generally not a fan of double renders, but that one was so dynamic... but I was trying to keep a "traditional" size sig for that one, and so decided to try the double render.  Wasn't a fan, myself.  And that text is absolute garbage.  Not sure what my deal was  

[Quik 4,113]

Review: Honestly, this would be amazing if all you changed was removing the mini-AA and the text. Everything else is so good that I wouldn't even need a text to say this is fantastic. Obviously, you could put a real nice text on this, probably with an Olde English font and some effects to it, and that would look great as well. But yeah, I think you got a little carried away with trying to do too much, because the render effects and everything else is real good on this sig, just those 2 pieces throw it off @Pandar