Good or Bad #1

[NickSunderbruch 392]

     So I'm trying a new article format, where I look at a team in the VHL and their stats and try to determine if they're "Good or Bad".

To determine whether a team is good or bad, we'll have to look at many stats. Not just their standing, but many other factors, like contract quality, cap space, player ages, prospects and many more things. So without further ado, lets take a look at our first team, The Seattle Bears. Probably an easy one right? Well, good is a relative term, we have a few things to look at first.

 

     Lets take a quick look at the cap space situation the Bears are facing. Seattle is an offensive power house, spending 24 million on their offensive lines alone. There seems to be a bright side to this as well, next season they'll likely be spending closer to 14 million on their offense, give or take a few million depending on trades, or prospects being called up. Seattle spends less than half of their offense, on their defense, clocking in at around 11.75 million. This seems like a problem for them, but however not for long. As of right now their defensive core isn't half as good as their offensive core. They have some incredible players on their defense like Odin Omdahl, but he's likely to experience depreciation this coming season. However the future looks bright for their defense as they have some good young talent on the roster, and they look to be getting even better in the next few seasons. The Bears spend only 3 million on their only goalie, Jacob Tonn. The 675 tpe goaltender has a great looking stat line, so I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the Bears have a good goalie situation as he'll only be making 1.5 million for the next three seasons with a NTC. All of these numbers this season add together for 38.75 million in cap salary, with 1.25 million left in cap space. They absolutely paid big for this season, but it seems like it's going to pay off big for the net few seasons with players making less soon.

 

     As good as their cap situation is looking, they're also looking good on the ice. Seattle is currently first place with 15 wins, 4 losses and one OT loss. Absolutely an excellent team, with some excellent potential for the future. I'd say that Seattle is GOOD and will be for quite some time. So that does it for this weeks .com article. Tell me what you think of the new format. Anyways stay frosty, Seacrest out. 

[ThePerfectNut 563]

4 hours ago, NickSunderbruch said:

     So I'm trying a new article format, where I look at a team in the VHL and their stats and try to determine if they're "Good or Bad".

To determine whether a team is good or bad, we'll have to look at many stats. Not just their standing, but many other factors, like contract quality, cap space, player ages, prospects and many more things. So without further ado, lets take a look at our first team, The Seattle Bears. Probably an easy one right? Well, good is a relative term, we have a few things to look at first.

 

     Lets take a quick look at the cap space situation the Bears are facing. Seattle is an offensive power house, spending 24 million on their offensive lines alone. There seems to be a bright side to this as well, next season they'll likely be spending closer to 14 million on their offense, give or take a few million depending on trades, or prospects being called up. Seattle spends less than half of their offense, on their defense, clocking in at around 11.75 million. This seems like a problem for them, but however not for long. As of right now their defensive core isn't half as good as their offensive core. They have some incredible players on their defense like Odin Omdahl, but he's likely to experience depreciation this coming season. However the future looks bright for their defense as they have some good young talent on the roster, and they look to be getting even better in the next few seasons. The Bears spend only 3 million on their only goalie, Jacob Tonn. The 675 tpe goaltender has a great looking stat line, so I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the Bears have a good goalie situation as he'll only be making 1.5 million for the next three seasons with a NTC. All of these numbers this season add together for 38.75 million in cap salary, with 1.25 million left in cap space. They absolutely paid big for this season, but it seems like it's going to pay off big for the net few seasons with players making less soon.

 

     As good as their cap situation is looking, they're also looking good on the ice. Seattle is currently first place with 15 wins, 4 losses and one OT loss. Absolutely an excellent team, with some excellent potential for the future. I'd say that Seattle is GOOD and will be for quite some time. So that does it for this weeks .com article. Tell me what you think of the new format. Anyways stay frosty, Seacrest out. 

About player salaries. You gotta look at the salary bracket in the index. 

Yes it says 1.5 mil for the next seasons, but at the start of each season. It will adjust depending on his TPA.

So if he hits 700 TPA for the next season, it will not me 1.5mil but 3.5 mil instead.

 

Small lil mistake, but good article tho. Excited to see my team

[ThePerfectNut 563]

and 3.5 mil is quite a lot for a goalie. Well anyone with over 700 TPE.

Not in real life tho

[Spartan 4,402]

do Moscow next!