boubabi

No. Reviewing is pointless nowadays.

Kendrick got a new girlfriend I see Are u trying to affect me by saying that I'm an asshole for proving my arguments? You must be hella brillant

Ayee you mad euh

There's way to validate infos and learning about a subject without having misguided opinions No need to censore things you don't fully understand, theres other solution before that. (At least here in Canada)

Better that than spreading/thinking false informations

These type of results makes me want to consider suicide

And I have every right to say that you have a poor ability to argue and that your opinions on that matter were weak and you shouldnt talk about a subject that you dont totally understand Fair?

Just admit that you had not enough informations and knowledge to have a solid opinion on Drouin's playing in MTL and you misjudged your arguments and thats enough from me. I'm far from the L in that story

The table doesnt matter. The only thing you should have had considered is : judging drouins number after 7 games is unfair and need more context to judge "TB's Drouin" and "MTL's Drouin" as they arent in the same role and context. Just that argument was enough to say that saying that Drouin was "meh" had no solid foundation The table not only prove that you had no foundation, but we could aslo say the opposite that drouin is FAR from being meh.From that moment, you lost all your credibility from me

Refuting your argument was enough at the time as I couldnt have had those numbers at the time. Your argument that Drouin was meh at center had just no foundation and that was the only thing I needed to prove.

Of course I am, because I validated my sources and brought opinions based on provable facts. I didnt went with "I like pink because I find it beautiful" weakass arguments

I wasnt affected by my emotions because thats just the way I am 24/7. Im told you, someone talking shit about things he doesnt understand pisses me off and find it important to prove him that he cant do that shit.You just felt in a corner and or you had nothing more to say other then "it is my opinion and I dont care about facts" and you blocked me. I might not be the best guy to say that, but I've never backed away or censore someone just because "my feelings were hurt". Thats what you did

No it doesn't. You are responding because 1st, you calmed down and became rational. 2nd, its because I simply showed a great source that proves your point wrong. You had nothing more on the table. If you, at the moment, still think that drouin is meh at center, I can easily say that you have an ignorant opinion and prove it

No, that info just confirms (and destroy) your only valid argument at the time that had weight in an argument. That said, even if drouin had lower production here as a center, its not fair to judge him after 6 games and also that you saw little to none from him in MTL. What you had to work with is, 5 points in 7 games. If you think that was meh, well drouin was Meh in TB as well

My attitude doesnt matter. I brought those same arguments on the table. You were just too affected by your emotion of feeling wrong that you turned defensive and became blind. Those are 100% the same arguments I was bringing.

Now you are just quoting my argument at the time where its not fair to judge a player during a 6 games losing streak and 7 total game Maybe my arguments were good and you were just too stubborn to look at time euh?

The GM in Arizona built his team from those numbers and take a look where they are now. Yes thosr are numbers but they need to be evaluated carefully and with context Context is where fong was WAY off

The difference is esthetic is mainly personal taste and can hardly be argued with numbers and straight facts. We could even argue that esthetic has little to none weight in a debate if the debate is which stick is better on the ice. However, saying that Drouin is "meh" at center in MTL and implying that he had "better" analytics in TB is simply false. Even the PPG argument is false as both are comparable. Plus, fong said that the Habs would be better with drouin at wing (because he was supposedly better at wing in TB) which I said was false because Drouin is more useful for the Habs, with his current production, at center the Drouin's production at wing. And that you can easily prove that logic just by looking at the depth chart of the CH. Therefore, saying that Drouin was "meh", plus would be more useful at wing for the Habs is completely false and considered as a ignorant opinion from a dude that didnt had enough infos/data to to prove his point From my position, I couldnt prove (at the time) his only argument that had a little bit of weight that was better analytic. My post above just shows that firstly, that is also not true, and the fong uses argument that arent true/verified to (try) to prove his points, which is a low blow. He can blame himself that he was ignorant and he misjudged the information maybe, but other than that, he just looked like a guy that didnt know what he was talking about, which profoundly pisses me off in my every day life as well.

That must be the dumbest logic i've ever read. Your opinion on ccm is based on your personal preferences. And even told that why, you add whatsoever no weight credibility/weight to your argument by just saying "I think ccm is better" without a "why". In this case, fong was saying that Drouin is meh and he tried to imply that he had better analytic last season as a winger in TB. Even though multiple other things could be considered (timing, number of games played etc), I've singularly proce that his "analytic" shit was bullshit (which was pretty much is lone argument that couldnt be proven or countered at the time). When I simply showed that drouin had the same PPG in tb and mtl, the dude just blocked me and you guys jerked off each others dick for a while He said whenever I had a counter argument I could show him, there you go. It adds to whatever logical argument that I had earlier and showed that Drouin was far from "meh" so far (if he thought that Drouin wasnt "meh" as a winger in Tampa." The whole argument that he is less good because the team loses is simply ridicule and shows a totale misunderstanding of the game and the player.

Yes, your opinion has no value if your arguments aren't true Sure you can have an opinion, but you can have a false one as well. Next time instead of blocking me on chat during an argument, he should face the truth that his opinion was unfounded and he should validate his saying before having those sort of statements and talking shit. The only thing that is fragile is your confidence Kendrick.

@tfong you wanted analytics to prove that drouin is better or at least equal as a center than a winger ? Don't talk shit if you don't know what you are talking about source : http://sportlogiq.com/ basically everything is better except for the turnovers in the D zone, which is understandable for a C

Bs

Such bs

How to have a good player in the vhl 1. 90+ scoring 2. semi active 3. ???? 4. Profit