Maxy

Meh, as someone who's pretty familiar with computers and is quite technically inclined (As it's my job) and someone who's used both new Macs and new windows computers I can say that I don't find that to be true. I saw nothing in a Mac that justified the price difference. The screen is great and all but it's not a selling point for me, I'd prefer to use my own screen. Yes they may use less reliable parts if you're buying a cheap or bargain PC. But most sites allow you to customize your PC down to a tee which I did with mine. I didn't even go all out because it's for work and I've got a great computer that does literally everything I need without any problems. It's all preference. To me I wouldn't shell out the extra because I don't find the actual product to be worth the price point personally

And with 2-3 programs and setting changes you'll never need to see the tiles again. I haven't seen the tiles since my first day with Windows 8

As someone who's used both Mac and Windows I would never recommend a Mac to someone personally. Macs are overpriced PCs sold at high prices based solely on their names. I don't buy into "It's lasting longer" because I've had PC's for 5+ years with 0 problems with them. There's really nothing to justify the price difference between Mac and PC. I just recently bought a new computer for work strictly and got a relatively up to date computer 8gigs of ram, I5 ect, and it's an HP for under $600. For the same specs you're looking at well over $1000 for an Mac based solely on the name. Windows 8 is nothing wrong with it if you're remotely technically inclined. If you're not good with computers at all (And the fact that you're on a sim hockey league says you're at least somewhat inclined on the internet) then Windows 8 is fine. 8.1 made it a bit better too, Win Key+X is the most useful thing I've seen in a long time for what I do for work. For under $1000 you can get a computer that will be able to play really any game you want for years to come comfortably.

For anyone who shops at Amazon, Tomb Raider Definitive Edition is the deal of the day, $39.99 and with Prime, free 2 day shipping. Can't beat that price. I picked it up on PS4, never played it on PS3 so stoked to see it on Next Gen

BF in terms of the engine and physics and whatnot is pretty realistic. The bullet drop and wind effects are pretty solid and the map size and whatnot is much but obviously the things like using a drill and assuming it will fix a blown up tank, or that everyone's going to run to one area, lie down and watch a flag raised to call the point there own, isn't exactly realistic. But overall the engine itself is pretty realistic.

Yeah Arma or America's Army is the most realistic by far

Game 5: Iron Eagles vs Royals 3 1

NA Game 3: Rush vs Wild EU Game 3: Iron Eagles vs Royal ------------------------------------------------------ NA Game 4: Rush vs Wild EU Game 4: Iron Eagles vs Royals

Yeah starting up is the hardest part because people have such powerful decks and things that make it hard to play for a new person I spent like $10 I think? For a few packs just because I got a late start in the beta, but for $10 (Since the game was free) I've gotten a ton of value out of it.

I just don't see myself enjoying it tbh, not my style. I don't like the mech combat and it reminds me too much of halo in the FPS style. (Which I don't like Halo either) I much prefer a game like Last of Us' multiplayer as it's more team based. I despise respawn, takes any skill out of the game imo. Some of my favorite games ever were military shooters but the lack of respawn made the games phenomenal and you actually had to rely on your team and teamwork.

Playing quietly but we're winning so that's all that matters

Titanfall will be the new COD imo. It'll sell tons (Maybe not right away but eventually) a ton of people will play it, after a month it'll be same old, same old. then eventually it'll just be a game that is tired and redundant.

But the whole game is not realistic, the only thing realistic about the game is the fact that they're humans and they're carrying somewhat real guns. That's it. Nothing else, the squads are smaller than a real military squad, the action is incredibly laughably fake, they're running around not using cover, they're just throwing grenades out pretty much anywhere... And the biggest unrealistic thing, the biggest ever. It's fucking respawn. Lol If you want a real military sim, that's realistic, play ARMA 3 or America's Army. That's as close as we're going to get to military simulation. With games like Operation Flashpoint being probably the closest thing on consoles.

Yeah because when soldiers kill 5 people they get to call in a guard dog who will just kill people. Then when you get 3 more you can call in precision air strikes at will. And soldiers spend the majority of their time sprinting around and jump sniping with bolt action rifles. COD is as unrealistic as any game out there. But I'm not interested in Titanfall either I think it looks pretty awful myself. I don't like mechs. But has anyone played Hearthstone? Open beta from Blizzard and not something I would normally be interested in but it's incredibly fun. Also been playing Outlast on the PS4 which is incredibly creepy, and Minecraft on PS4 is great fun.

Alex Semin's Purse and I'd put Lemieux over Jagr too I'm gonna not continue with Semin because fuck him Sedin Sisters or Staal Brothers for better duo (Fuck Mark Staal... Jordan and Eric are the ones I'm referring to)

Stamkos but I love them both Stamkos or Perry as a goal scorer

Marty St. Louis ainec. Marty St. Louis or Theo Fleury for better little guy

Datsyuk. Best overall player in the world imo Datsyuk or Patty Kane for shootout dangles

People forget Kunitz was playing first line on the Ducks when we won the cup Liked from My team 1-Ryan Getzlaf 2-Emerson Etem 3-Jakob Silvferberg 4-John Gibson 5-Andrew Cogliano Like Other than my team 1-Nathan Gerbe 2-Martin St. Louis 3-Jonathan Bernier 4-Steven Stamkos 5-Ben Bishop ----------------- Top 5 Dislike 1- Anyone on the Kings 2- Anyone on the Sens 3- Anyone on the Habs 4- Daniel Alfredsson 5- John Scott

Morgan Goals Points

My photoshop was acting up yesterday so I couldn't finish this sig until this morning If not tis okay it can be used this week but was hoping for last week

Not so much that he's good, I just dislike the team he's on and how much everyone talks about him, while he's good and will be great, it's aggravating to see his name in the same talks as Brady, Manning, Brees when I feel he's not nearly on the same level as them... Yet Edit: He's not on their level yet imo

I don't think he's arrogant either, I just hate him

I disagree on AP. That's not arrogance as he didn't say anything putting down the current record holder nor did he say anything to discredit anyone or even to say he's the best ever. He said that he was chasing the record that he was within 10 yards of completing last season. He has confidence in himself and said what his goal was. He was extremely close last year and felt he was going to be even better this year. I have no problem with that. Aaron Rodgers, I hate him too so I don't have an issue with that But AP is a class act