Jump to content

Recommended Posts

before the season I did predictions on where I thought each team would finish in the standings: 

 

imma go over it to see how badly i fckd up.

Predictions for NA:

 

Playoffs:

1. LA Stars

2. Seattle Bears

3. Vancouver Wolves

4. Chicago Phoenix

5. Toronto Legion

Not the playoffs:

6. Calgary Wranglers

7. D.C. Dragons

8. New York Americans

Reality for NA:

Playoffs:

1. Chicago Phoenix 88 pts

2. Toronto Legion 87 pts

3. Seattle Bears 85 pts

4. LA Stars 84 pts

5. Vancouver Wolves 79

Not the playoffs:

6. Calgary Wranglers 69 pts (nice)

7. New York Americans 65 pts

8. D.C. Dragons 61 pts

ngl these predictions where better than I though they would be. All the teams I thought would make the playoffs did just in a fucked up order. Because of that there weren't too many surprises in my predictions other than New York miraculously not finishing last. The Toronto legion finishing as high as they did was also a little bit of a shock as I thought they'd need a bit more time to develop but apparently not. Also rory and LA failed me by not finishing first in the division like they promised, I think I actually substituted them with Chicago which would've made my predictions more accurate but Jeffery Pines had to shit the bed like usual. And of course LA sweeps Chicago somehow smh, STHS is a joke. The only other thing to mention about the division is how bad D.C was, I mean they weren't S76 Davos but fuck I thought they would do better than dead last in the league.

Predictions for EU:

 

Playoffs:

1. London United

2. Warsaw Predators

3. Helsinki Titans

4. Riga Reign

5. Prague Phantoms

Not the Playoffs:

6. Malmo Nighthawks

7. Moscow Menace

8. HC Davos Dynamo

Reality for EU:

Playoffs:

1. Warsaw Predators 98 pts

2. London United 93 pts

3. Helsinki Titans 90 pts

4. Prague Phantoms 84 pts

5. Malmo Nighthawks 67 pts

Not the Playoffs:

6. HC Davos Dynamo 67 pts

7. Riga Reign 66 pts

8. Moscow Menace 62 pts

I think it's worth mentioning first that I lowballed my expectations for Riga in my initial predictions, I genuinely thought we'd finish 1st or 2nd in the league this season. I have no idea wtf happened to our team as we got considerably worse despite having better players than the previous season, it mad absolutely no sense and I don't think I'll ever get over it. On top of that all the other teams in the EU seemingly finished the season where they should have, in other words STHS decided to ass fuck Riga and Riga only this season which pisses me off even more. Now that I'm done my rant I got the top two kinda right, just needed to swap them into the right order. Helsinki finished 3rd like I thought they would. To steal Rigas RIGHTFULL place at 4th is god damn Prague who played way over there heads this season. Then after that it's basically a three way Tie between Riga Malmo and Davos for the last playoff spot, of course STHS had to give us a glimmer of hope on the last day of the season where we went 3-1 in the last sim only to miss out by 1 point. Then Malmo by some miracle of god with there clusterfuck of 300 TPE forwards sneak into playoffs only to get molested by Prague in three games. Also Moscow finishes last lol.

595 words

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://vhlforum.com/topic/102645-revisiting-my-early-season-predictions/
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RedSus said:

To steal Rigas RIGHTFULL place at 4th is god damn Prague who played way over there heads this season.

 

we-are-better.jpg

 

2 hours ago, RedSus said:

Then Malmo by some miracle of god with there clusterfuck of 300 TPE forwards sneak into playoffs only to get molested by Prague in three games.

 

They spared you their fate.

Review: I like it when guys do this, revisit old stuff they did. Also, the corresponding colours look cool. Underlining and bolding makes titles pop, and the content is funny and quality shit. STHS is a god damn joke. 

9/10

Review love the revisit types of things, the colors for each team pop nicely and the bold and underline titles make it easy to understand what section the reader is on, I would have liked a little information on what you think went right/wrong for teams that surprised you but that’s nitpicking 

 

rating 9.5/10

Love this concept for a media spot. They way that you have used the teams colours to help separate and differentiate between the teams makes it easy to read. Next time you could maybe add like a little review  of each teams season to give some more context and it would allow you to also give your thoughts on how those teams did. Overall, good job!

 

9/10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...