valmount

[jack 498]

[Kesler 1,514]

I fucking adore this sig.

[jack 498]

I adore you, brovy

[Phil 5,129]

so fucking awesome!

[Ahma 1,443]

Thanks, again

[Jala 922]

I don't know if I'm just missing it, but is there no lighting on this one?

[jack 498]

What do you mean? Lighting isn't just one layer you put on at the end, it's the entire dynamic created throughout the sig.

[boubabi 4,725]

I got that covered

[jack 498]

mm perfect

[Mr.Baller 440]

Not bad bro but I feel like it's a step back from what you made lately.

[Jala 922]

I don't see any lightness in it, just seems really dark and flat. I get marked down for it all the time, so I'm trying to see how you pros do it, but I feel like I'm missing it here?

[Jala 922]

I don't see any lightness in it, just seems really dark and flat. I get marked down for it all the time, so I'm trying to see how you pros do it, but I feel like I'm missing it here?

Anyone have any tips or an explanation?

[Caillean 504]

What do you mean? Lighting isn't just one layer you put on at the end, it's the entire dynamic created throughout the sig.

Sure, but it doesn't look like there's any at all. It looks flat as someone's stretched out balls.

[boubabi 4,725]

Lighting and Light source is different. In this case, there's no additional light source. The light comes naturally from the original picture. I might say this is a dark sig but the lighting is there, you can see it on his face, on his back etc.

[Caillean 504]

Lighting and Light source is different. In this case, there's no additional light source. The light comes naturally from the original picture. I might say this is a dark sig but the lighting is there, you can see it on his face, on his back etc.

I suppose... all I know is when I turn in sigs where the renders look like that, I get told it looks like ass. All I'm sayin.