Victor Grachev Miami Marauders Jersey Card

[KaleebtheMighty 1,509]

 

 

Edited July 19, 2020 by KaleebtheMighty

[fishy 1,757]

Hellooooo, I'm here for a review!!!!!!

The autograph is a nice touch. The background with team name is neat, but the white makes it look kind of plain. Would maybe recommend changing that from white, maybe to grey? Overall appreciate the vibe, but don't really understand the red square?? Maybe I'm missing something but that's definitely better than just leaving it black. Overall, nice job, and would gladly have Socks in this uniform. 7.5/10!

[KaleebtheMighty 1,509]

11 minutes ago, fishy said:

Hellooooo, I'm here for a review!!!!!!

The autograph is a nice touch. The background with team name is neat, but the white makes it look kind of plain. Would maybe recommend changing that from white, maybe to grey? Overall appreciate the vibe, but don't really understand the red square?? Maybe I'm missing something but that's definitely better than just leaving it black. Overall, nice job, and would gladly have Socks in this uniform. 7.5/10!

Thanks for the review! Just to clarify, the red square is a piece of a jersey kind of like how some hockey cards today contain pieces of the player's jersey. I appreciate the criticism though, gives me more to improve upon for next time!

[mattyIceman 1,214]

Hey I like this sig, I'll review it too!

 

I absolutely dig the player render, the whole simplistic jersey color scheme and a nice clean logo swap.  Very classic and books very neat.

 

The gray background is a nice touch, if it was layered transparent over some kind of out of focus rink setting it would be more impactful.

 

The upper deck, VHLM logo and that signature are all bonus points for me.  Give the card a real look-and feel.

 

I do get the idea (judging by above response) that the red detailed square is "jersey fabric", however it does kinda look a bit out of place.  I dont get the UD Jersey part either, perhaps enlighten me?

 

What would have made this sig cool is some kind of classic border, and some "draft class" Upper Deck edition, boosting its value in some kind of trading community.  Points for imagination.

 

Overall score: 9.5/10

 

Minus points for the background, no border and the square thingy.

[KaleebtheMighty 1,509]

2 hours ago, MattyIce said:

Hey I like this sig, I'll review it too!

 

I absolutely dig the player render, the whole simplistic jersey color scheme and a nice clean logo swap.  Very classic and books very neat.

 

The gray background is a nice touch, if it was layered transparent over some kind of out of focus rink setting it would be more impactful.

 

The upper deck, VHLM logo and that signature are all bonus points for me.  Give the card a real look-and feel.

 

I do get the idea (judging by above response) that the red detailed square is "jersey fabric", however it does kinda look a bit out of place.  I dont get the UD Jersey part either, perhaps enlighten me?

 

What would have made this sig cool is some kind of classic border, and some "draft class" Upper Deck edition, boosting its value in some kind of trading community.  Points for imagination.

 

Overall score: 9.5/10

 

Minus points for the background, no border and the square thingy.

Thank you for the review! So here’s another actual card that has the UD Game Jersey aspect that I was trying to base this off of:
 

 

Love the idea of a classic border and something like a transparent rink layer behind the player, I may try that on a future card! Thanks again!

[mattyIceman 1,214]

Well I see where you got the idea now!  Even on this card I'm not a fan of the jersey thingy though.. glad I can help to inspire!