Jump to content

Kendrick

Members
  • Posts

    17,079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Everything posted by Kendrick

  1. Works for me. They needed a GM
  2. Which would be a shame, but given the history in success that's just how I voted.
  3. Riga is one of the most successful franchises in the VHL though
  4. That's hot!
  5. Should be Stockholm, worst franchise record
  6. Various Tribal Cows is how I read it
  7. Just to take down a recent thought, no Cologne doesn't face weaker opponents more than NY. However nY does have better players.
  8. Backward mentality for recruiting. I do what I can with the minimal graphic expertise I have and try things. That's actually the point of that section
  9. And what is that? It says editor in the VHL Mag area from what I can see
  10. That wasn't sarcasm. I was just trying to figure out what your stance on that was. Are you the editor or the publisher. That is all. If you don't want to answer the is fine, but it was just a question. I also never said the editor was lazy, as from what I understand there is no editor anymore but just a publisher. You could showcase my sigs if you want, but it wouldn't really men anything but: Welcome to the VHL, if Boubabi doesn't think your sigs are any good you might as well go to another sim league. Which, good luck with your recruitment if thats the thinking behind it.
  11. I never said replace you actually, you just took it as that. I said hire an editor for that sort of things, you have told me you are not the editor in this thread. What is it, are you or are you not? You think I haven't improved, but who said you are the be-all-end-all of graphics? I've tried different things. You calling things lazy is just trying to "puff your chest" about graphical work which is a huge reason why a lot of people have chosen other sim leagues over this one.
  12. Once again, I never said that was an issue. You are reading his "out of context" interpretation here. I just noticed the headers can be off.
  13. But mine wasn't a complaint. It was a suggestion that we may need an editor, given you are just the publisher. You have taken it into a bit of rage after that though. No I don't, nor have they claimed they are. But it's obvious that everyone on this site that produces sigs that is not you, you feel will never get to your level. You have stated that to be a thing in the past. Actually, I make sigs because I'm more of a writer and feel it's fun to do so. But it's good that you are out here trying to ruin peoples enjoyment of this site by shit talking their work just because you are upset. I'll leave it at that
  14. Lazy about it? I put in articles every two weeks. It was actually a position i held for a long time. I think you're trying to reach here pretty far. Haha weak ass sigs. Yes they are not great, because I'm not a graphic artist or anything. This are weak attempts. #HesTickled
  15. Yeah I was hoping the recruitment part of the site can be turned around. Of course and I think thats a good start to through your name into the hat
  16. No, actually I stepped down from that job at the beginning of the year. I even informed @Devise...so nice try.
  17. Wasn't bitchin, but glad you read it out of context.
  18. Underappreciated sure, and I understand that. My initial suggestion was just to have a the grammatical side of things brushed up a bit. It's obvious the graphical side of things is top notch.
  19. Weird, the mag said you were. Maybe we can find an editor, as was my suggestion in the first place haha
  20. So essentially you are not the editor. Understood.
  21. I never said the articles were the issue and if there was a mistake there I'm sure I could talk to them individually. I was talking the headers, that's all. You read into this too much
  22. Because...theres an actual job called Player Page Updater. It was my belief and several others most likely (because it says that in the mag) that you are the editor. Maybe the definition of editor is not clear to you, which isn't really a bad thing but might need explaining.
  23. Wait so you're just the publisher then?
  24. It's your opinion, but in no way does it hold up without anything pointing to that. That was reach
×
×
  • Create New...