Jump to content

JardyB10

Members
  • Posts

    19,217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    89

Everything posted by JardyB10

  1. SUMMARY
  2. SUMMARY
  3. Hey, at least @TheMinimum got on the ice for 16 minutes!
  4. SUMMARY
  5. SUMMARY
  6. SUMMARY
  7. SUMMARY
  8. SUMMARY
  9. SUMMARY
  10. SUMMARY
  11. SUMMARY
  12. SUMMARY
  13. I thought one of the draws of two players was GMs could now have a little bit of freedom from their own franchise? Now the popular opinion is the opposite? Before we go making more decisions based on half-baked logic, I just want to point out that I don't think Player 2 is responsible for harming rivalries. Sure it would have a little effect, I'd certainly be less inclined to hate one other team in the league. But that leaves 8 other teams yet. Sure my teammates might have players on those teams, but as I always say, fuck those teammates! I'd even say that removing rivalry games contributed just as much to the dulling of rivalries than Player 2 did. #bringbackR5 Rivalries have been slow for a while now. They most only existed because of our more bitchy members quite frankly. Like, Phil and I aren't going to incite a rivalry any time soon, but Pablo and DT might, and have. Rivalries are slower because we don't hate each other as much, and best rivalries form when the stars align and all the pieces of shit in the league form on one team, like New York every season. Or just cocky overconfident superteams in general. And then those pieces of shit incite Kendrick and Bushito, and then we all decide to hate them because nobody likes Devise and ADV and Jericho and their stupid Rogue 1 players on their stupid New York team because fuck New York. If you want more rivalries, start being dicks to people. Not like Anderson did, but there's definitely an acceptable ground in the middle. And unfortunately, no, giveth then taketh away is never a good strategy, and that includes contraction. I'll say this every time it gets brought up, but VHLM already proved that contraction is useless. The exact same arguments were made every time the league got contracted, but lo and behold it never actually helped that much. It's a terrible Band-Aid idea that needs to die. You'd be better off rebooting the league. Which is also a bad idea. Also if you wanted vintage, nostalgia VHL, almost none of the major changes in the last 20 seasons should have taken place. We didn't want to live and die by the old VHL format, so now we're forced to keep pivoting to find what works. Unfortunately we can't really backtrack to classic VHL at this point.
  14. You know, the time differential between when the index BEGINS to get updated and when I post the first game is definitely less than a minute. So you'd be as well off as to wait until a new topic is posted.
  15. SUMMARY
  16. First star, bitch!
  17. SUMMARY
  18. SUMMARY
  19. SUMMARY
  20. SUMMARY
  21. SUMMARY
  22. SUMMARY
  23. I don't feel like reading through this, but this has something we've been discussing for the better part of the week now and we should be sending out feelers for Blue interest soon. Also, while it is indeed very quite important we get another active Commie, it is not as "do or die" as you think it is. Will and I might be lazy bastards, but if you think we'd just sit around fingering each others buttholes while the league falls to shit in the off-season because we're too self-important to help out at all, you're delusional. We once had a website literally die and we bounced back, I think a few of us can handle two weeks of off-season.
  24. @STZ is going to ruin us all.
  25. SUMMARY
×
×
  • Create New...