eaglesfan036 4,585 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I know Ali is inactive But Cologne traded Ali to Davos in S41 off season and then they acquire him back in S42 Off-Season. Isn't that against the rule 6.6? 6.6 – Reacquiring a Player Previously Traded get um Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregreg 930 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I know Ali is inactive But Cologne traded Ali to Davos in S41 off season and then they acquire him back in S42 Off-Season. Isn't that against the rule 6.6? 6.6 – Reacquiring a Player Previously Traded late to the party.. I guess they could void it but one part of the trade was already used in tonight's draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,563 Posted April 26, 2015 Admin Share Posted April 26, 2015 I know Ali is inactive But Cologne traded Ali to Davos in S41 off season and then they acquire him back in S42 Off-Season. Isn't that against the rule 6.6? 6.6 – Reacquiring a Player Previously Traded ah but you forget rule 6.6.13: no one gives a shit about rule 6.6 if it's not blatant. gorlab 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorlab 4,321 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I am Victor's right hand man and what he says, goes. Victor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now