Megster 63 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 What do you think constitutes an inactive? I have gotten in to this argument with Kendrick twice since I've come back and with recent events involving GIYGAS it becomes even more questionable. For those who missed the GIYGAS case Muffins hadn't posted in ages, let alone do anything relating to his player. However, he did continue to log on periodically, probably just lurking or responding to PMs. Riga tried to re-sign GIYGAS as an inactive but the Victator said no, claiming because he had logged in he wasn't inactive. And then, the debate began, a couple of GMs and prominent members weighed in on what they considered an inactive. I think my favorite one was this: Kendrick Officer Wiggum Updaters 49,098 posts LocationVancouver Posted 05 March 2014 - 08:49 PM Mike, on 05 Mar 2014 - 8:46 PM, said: Victor told me he didn't consider Muffins inactive b/c he has logged into the site even though he hasn't posted. Yeah I think activity should mean a forum post, not really logging in. Otherwise he can see stuff but doesn't care to anything? If he had any say in his player he'd post right? Like This Kameron Taylor - Center - Cologne Express - #51 I have as many superbowls as Colin Kaepernick Report I guess that makes me active, huh? Anyways, while this was going on Chris must have gone swag stealth mode and hit Damien up on skype because Damien showed up and accepted the New York contract. Now it is my understanding that what constitutes an active is being debated amongst the BoG right now. I just would like to know what do you consider to be the line between activity and inactivity? For me it's whether or not they're logging on, because as long as you are logging on you are probably getting and responding to PMs. In which case you would be able to receive a contract offer even though you might miss it on the boards. And how long does someone have to be "inactive" to be considered AN inactive? I know I have gone a week or so without logging in before and much longer without updating my player but when is that line crossed? Do you have to be upgrading your player to be active? What do you guys think? Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie 438 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 I love you. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-49320 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devise 4,475 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 If a player doesn't even bother to come on and claim Welfare despite the fact that they are visiting the site and it takes ZERO effort, then they should be classified as an inactive. Runny Nose, diamond_ace and Kendrick 3 Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-49379 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOOM 8,745 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 You are asking the wrong question Meg..... Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-49392 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fire Tortorella 2,653 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 If a player doesn't even bother to come on and claim Welfare despite the fact that they are visiting the site and it takes ZERO effort, then they should be classified as an inactive. This, and this goes for situations in the VHLM too. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-49516 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munk 1,298 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 I love you. Wanna back the fuck up there, Catwoman? Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-49715 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megster 63 Posted March 9, 2014 Author Share Posted March 9, 2014 If a player doesn't even bother to come on and claim Welfare despite the fact that they are visiting the site and it takes ZERO effort, then they should be classified as an inactive. we never treated nagger like an inactive so the precedent isn't there for that statement Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-49803 Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachReilly 688 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 we never treated nagger like an inactive so the precedent isn't there for that statement nagger posted, so there's your precedent. Link to comment https://vhlforum.com/topic/5746-what-is-activity/#findComment-51098 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now