Victor

A mature attitude. I can only imagine the reaction if someone responded to your suggestion like that.

Hot fire.

But what would the reasons be? Why would anyone wait 3 seasons if that was an option?

and how would you encourage that?

Congratulations Dangles!

Excellent.

GG

And yeah @Mr. Power's idea of making it available for everyone makes sense too... though I don't imagine it would be that popular. Maybe, i dunno, it doesn't matter either. I think the main question is how bad are players with attributes in their 20s? Because if they're just shit then the better idea would be start at 40 but with a harsh update scale from 40 to 70 (then keep the same scale as right now from 70 to 99).

well try harder

last season!

I don't think it should be offered straight away. but 1-2 weeks in we go "oh hey do you want a second player too? here's how it works..."

Two 1-goal losses, unfortunate sim. Still racking up the individual stats though!

Bratislava 5 shots @Ventas 4 shots, 2 goals

damn tough loss. GG

Tried to get you but Bern is a solid alternative I suppose. Perhaps we'll meet in the finals!

Yukon claims Sampson.

Branching off from the main proposal, and after a fairly unrelated discussion with my Yukon Rush peeps ( @Tixe @Dangles13 @Digg ), I came to this realisation: Second players addresses a key issue in not having enough to do during the week but the people most affected by that issue (new members) won't actually feel the benefits until it may be too late. Because of the 3-season restriction, which I do believe is necessary, if we implemented this right now (which we won't, don't worry), S50 and even S49 draftees would have to wait until S51/52 at the earliest to create another player. Which isn't that long but still altogether adds up to approaching half a year IRL. So, my suggestion to address this: give new members the option of creating a second player soon after joining. The caveat: this player would start with lower attributes (I'm thinking as low as 20), maybe even with some sort of update scale from 30 to 40, and maybe a limit on how much TPE can be spent on that player. In the end, that player will still join the S53 draft class (for an S50 draftee), but will have been in existence for a bit longer. A few resulting issues: 1. Where will these players play before they become equivalents of normal players? - I say still the VHLM. 2. What about carryover? - Yeah so obviously this will give these players extra TPE due to the earlier start but I don't really care - if they break some TPE record, good for them, it's still be a challenge, and well I feel it's a minor hand-out really for new members who start at a disadvantaged position anyway. 3. Should there be an attribute cap? - I think it'd be silly to allow someone to just put all TPE in scoring and then become draft-eligible with 99 scoring in the VHLM. One solution is instituting an update scale between 20 and 40, while I'd also say these players should be encouraged to get to 40 in all attributes before starting to max out the others. * * - speaking of 40, any attributes still below 40 at the day of actual draft eligibility (in this hypothetical scenario it would be S52 trade deadline), would be bumped up to 40 anyway to regain equal footing. Not the best worded idea possibly with some work to do, but IMHO it has legs.

fine fine edited I'm happy if donations are the main criticism at this point.

god damn we're bad this isn't some all-time greatest team

dat 6. Vikings , STO C1 1 (DAV LW3, STO D5) at 3:38 7. Vikings , DAV LW3 2 (STO D4, STO C3) at 19:44 (PP)

Davos would arguably be the most promising team in Europe, if only they could get along.

Damn we have just been served justice.

I hope you both get traded to Vasteras.