boubabi

@Phil Because the TPE amount we could win in the VHLM is too attractive to pass. But restricting players to upgrade during the season for that is useless in my opinion. The VHLM always ruled like this, I mean, the 200 tpe cap was clearly a good idea but again, I don't see why we couldn't go further then that. @Kendrick I mean, you will clearly always have an advantage over, for exemple, Jerrick Poole, who were in the same draft class. Thats how it is, there is better player and this is how we reward hard working members. Why couldn't we reward members in the VHLM too ? Player will accouter better players in the VHL at some point, why even trying to even that in the VHLM when it's clearly not representing what it really is. and as you can see, I'm a defensemen so I'm clearly not looking to break any record here, but I was just wondering why this rule have ever been created at first.

you literally talked to me via chat because I had 181 TPE placed on my player so it could be cool to know the actual rule I don't see where it says the 200 tpe rule for undrafted player tbh

I actually did win some awards in the VHLM with Lindberg. And what is the 200 instead of 175 ? I personally stopped placing tpe at 175. And a clear example of the problem could be shown with last year award where an inactive have won an award (Razzle Dazzle) over an active member. This could explain why Danny Schneider (Inactive) could win an award over an active player this season. And again, I'm not saying I have the only good answer here, I'm glad you guys give me your opinion on that so I could understand your point of view

and I had 90 tpe with Linberg (Lundberg at the time) and I wasn't in the top of the league leaders but I didn't care much since it wasn't my primary goal. I mean, if members only based their activity level on that, well their motivation isn't on the right place. I worked hard with Lindberg to have that kind of advantage over other people, I don't see why other members won't have the follow the same path I did with Lindberg.

Player A : 175 placed tpe + 75 banked = 250 TPE Player B : 175 TPE + 0 banked = 175 Lets say, in their season, this will both have the same x amount of points But in the draft, the player A will likely be drafted way higher since he has a bigger tpe amount. What I'm saying is why trying to even the players when it won't matter in the draft. The Player A has obviously the better player (not talking member wise of course) so why won't we reward the better player ? Or at least give him a chance to make a difference ?

But still, member who stays longer in the VHLM value more compare to any other "growing" player. I know it won't happen often...but player with high amount of tpe who recreates will likely have the same problem in the future since they will reach the 175 tpe mark at the beginning of the next season. So they will bank their TPE for the rest of the season and don't improve, which freaking sucks at some point the gorlab tl;dr : FUCK THIS SHIT, I RATHER RETIRE MY PLAYER

As you know, I like to do shit suggestions to the league. ATM, I've reached my VHLM Cap hit (175 placed and 25 banked), I literally just learn banked tpe, which is kind of boring. I do personally think this was a good idea (the new cap of 200 since the league has evolved since) but I don't get why we should restrict people to keep progressing. Last year, we saw Zoidberg and Harumpf tearing shit up since they were pretty much at 300 tpe at the end of their VHLM career. TPE whores like Kendrick, Boom, Green and me had or will reach a high amount of TPE in the VHLM but the problem is, my player, atm, is as good as Danny Schneider (a VHLM inactive) and since I work hard to achieve that amount of TPE, I don't know why I shouldn't get rewarded in the sim for that. This doesn't seem like a suggestion (yet), but I would like to know and discuss the reasons why the BoG and/or the VHLM Commissioners put this rule in place and maybe you could convince me that it should stay the same. I know one of argument was that the recreates have a particular advantage over the first-gen or so but this will be reflected on the draft too so I don't see why we should restrict player's performances for "equality". I mean, BOOM's player and mine will likely stay in the VHLM for a short period of time so lets give the player performance advantages for the VHLM GMs instead. Of course, lets stay classy on this topic (Looking at you gorlab and Frank(it's an obvious joke(I mean, you aren't a joke but the joke is my joke of making a joke of your recent suggestion))) *Inception*

S42> but yeah, solid draft class

the glasses spell was super effective

Your eyes doesn't have enough XP or just refill your mana pts and use your glasses spell

and btw, Karnage couldn't play in the VHL this season since he's a S42 draftee.

We are pretty much in a rebuilding process and since we haven't any trade value compared to Davos, of course we couldn't be really competitive this season. And to be honest, the results are disappointing but not that much. I mean, We aren't a score fess like Seattle or Davos last season so at least we got that. I'm pretty pumped for our future though, I already have a solid defensive core in Ruutu Kowalski and Light and the future looks bright for that. Lets include Lord Karnage to that who could be the first oa in any draft (except for the O'Malley/Richardson draft) so it's not that bad. Plus, I decided to rebuild a bit later since it would fit my rebuild timing perfectly (50% of the first rounders next draft). So the Viks are actually the next big thing

Is that your list of the team you don't want to play with ? The Viks are so proud

oh yeah, if teammates mean random dude, yes.

Koradek much ?

This is too

Gosh, this is awful

Karnage played 1 game with Boston College. Actually, he played 7 minutes before being ejected for initiating a line brawl and hurting a fan in the stands. The fan is still in a profound coma.

explain

We started the last Graphic Rank in S39 (it ended in S40) so technically, if we want to have constant graphic contests, the next one should start near the S41 deadline. Of course, it's damn early to start discussions but I would like to know if someone is interested to "hots" the competition this time ? Of course, lats time I did it but I wanted to know if some of you guys are interested in another graphic contest. Plus, I would like to know your opinion on how we should run this. Plus, I do think the graphic community is growing so we could organize more competitions at some point.

I'll kill your mother Or I'll kill your mother aha Which one seems more like a joke ?

STO G making a case for top goalie ? #

I wasn't a bad movie. I mean, this film wasn't made to be in the same categories of Fight Club or anything else. It was made for pure entertainment. Of course, the entertainment concept isn't quite the same for everyone but it sure is for the majority of people. I'm fascinated by VFX so of course I enjoyed this portion of the movie.

Nah, there's too many grammatical mistakes to be a Devising post.