Jump to content

boubabi

Members
  • Posts

    16,793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    119

Everything posted by boubabi

  1. OP team with wayne gretzky Krigars in the squad I smell gold
  2. also, jenkins is a D
  3. well, 24 fps wasn't decided for a particular reason. I mean, lets all agree that at least 16 fps is required the illusion of motion but the rumors are told that was a pretty random number and it was mostly due to economic reason that 24 fps was chosen. I mean, 35mm film isnt free lmao
  4. Oh right, the hobbit was in 48 fps, that's right what a horrible idea
  5. By 2 camera,s I meant 2 lenses. 35mm is overrated. I mean, not everyone is Christopher Nolan who can still film on those films. Anyway, I think 3d camera in hollywood uses to lenses, and they use a mirror to bounce the second lense to not have too much of a perspective difference anymore. I can be wrong, However, I think it's normal to composite the 3d shots later because you can adjust manually the perspective of your 2 shots to get more depth in some things, and less in some other, so I think the whole digitally added thingy is necessary. But yes, mostly cash grab. I mean, after the avatar hype, everyone was trying (and many failed) 3d movies. I mean, the hobbit in 3D was horrible and made people barf because there was just too much thing going on. btw, have you looked to the TVs that convert 24 fps to a fake 60 fps ? It's horrible. It makes every hollywood movie fake as hell. It's quite an interesting thing to see.
  6. Blame the simmer :,( HE DIDN'T REMOVE THE INJURIES
  7. I could see a place for 3d in Imax movies, as I feel it could add to the whole "spectacle" and "amazement" of the thing. But 3d in a movie with a plot and such, its a no no
  8. Says the 77 oa Krigars AH AH AH
  9. @Bushito You forgot the league leading tpe in Franchise Cornerstone (Mongolia - team world)
  10. Meh, not quite sure about those numbers. Dont see how hollywood wouldnt shot with 2 cameras (for 2 different perspectives to our eyes) for a better result. Faking 3D with 2D shots was done in the early days and it looked quite awful and it was obvious. Anyway, 3d movies were a trend for some time, it slowed down a bit in recent memory, which is good
  11. Meh, its a step forward to a more immersive experience I guess, but thats just not by cup of tea for the moment as I feel like 3D just adds sensationlism to a movie, which isnt what I weight in a good movie or not
  12. Euhhhh
  13. yea, like 10% of people can't fully appreciate a 3d movie due to a medical issue or something. You don't miss much imo
  14. at imax centre des sciences
  15. shutout : 2 tpe the impossible achievement
  16. we could use some goaltenders. amirite
  17. looking good m8
  18. more like SEASON 58 MVP amirite
  19. @jRuutu U should really write a media spot to make a summary of your thoughts and possible idea for the 3/4 lines concept, because I think those multiple posts make it difficult to really get your point. So my suggestion would be to write a media spot and bring in all together, I think it will be more efficient, and a more healthy debate
  20. More like a Migos song probably Amirite
  21. Well then that needs a lot more explanations . Why Cornerstone wouldn't be on the list lmao
  22. the fuck you are talking about. WE WANT NAMES
×
×
  • Create New...