Kendrick

TOR DAV TOR COL

Longer than 10 years though I think.

I'm not on it at all haha

Was far from rigged, but that's part of the reason we shutdown.

Okay so just the more recent stuff, fair enough.

That begs the question then, if you knew the risk and the past history of him, why back him?

Haha good one

We should re-sim, I know Boubabi is wanting it.

Denise trades me away and I bite him in the ass!

Good lines Higgins

So long there was a player in between, we feel old now.

Of course, I think that goes for most loyal fans of teams.

Regardless of team? Or simply just the 49ers. I don't think that team could save Gabberts career though.

The Zimmers Award?

A disagreement doesn't mean you have to get all frustrated. Still no "proof" though of what you've done to qualify. Not really sure how a new replacement makes me scared? If Seattle got Sterling, ADV, Victor or Boulet as the GM replacement sure I'd be worried for my teams future success, but not scared. Not really sure how that positively effects your case for the spot though.

No but by ruling those three out you are automatically trying to fit him somewhere in that list, which is something I wouldn't suggest because I don't think he can win them out. How am I making things up? Is that your way of saying you can't support it realistically and are simply coming at it with 49ers glasses on?

Newton may be inconsistent but he still is above Kaepernick in terms of overall production. Who cares though still 3-4 bodies in there ahead of him (forgot Romo). If you think Kaepernick has the skill to beat out Rodgers, Romo, Brees and Wilson for All-Pro, then you might want to revert back to the whole Anthony Davis and everyone else retiring issue.

You realize that most of the good GM's have come from the VHLM though. So thinking only changes slightly. You can't really have a VHLM GM hat and a VHL GM hat and think they are far off when it comes to initiative. Yes some of the transactions are different, but it's the overall attitude. If a person is fired in the VHLM, it's looked at as the lowest form of firing and being considered for a VHL GM job should be out the window at that point. Call it hilarious but when a new GM is decided, they will see the retiring and swift un-retiring of your player as very irresponsible, it's just the nature of what goes with doing that. What proof do we have though? The only history you have as a GM is in the VHLM where you were fired. In the VHL you were an acting Assistant GM who was forced to sign draftees after another GM figured out the inability of the head GM (Bushito). What trades were done by you? Is the team a Cup favourite right not? If not, are their picks in place for the next couple years? The proof if their is any, is not very open for everyone to see.

Boom you were worried.

Of course he did, but his agent should be smart enough to say "Hey Colin, you realize this could fuck you over big time if you don't live up to expectations?". If he did say that, then Colin ain't too bright. I get all the team stuff, thats not what his contract is poor because though. It's poor because of personal achievement incentives. Sign a normal contract and he is fine, but the one he signed changes from year to year with stupid little incentives that could cost him. Things such as 80% of all snaps, Super Bowl appearance, 1st/2nd team all pro. So technically if he wants the last one he has to beat out Brees, Rodgers, Newton, Ryan, Wilson and Foles for 1st or 2nd team all-pro.

But they do though, it shows a lack of stability which is the reason we are currently in this situation. I'm not trying to get you to lash out, I'm handing you what the naked eye sees from what has been seen on the board. A person being fired in the VHLM doesn't really endorse a VHL GM job every well. It's not really unneeded either as it pertains to you who brought up being the Bears GM. So unless you wanted to avoid that topic, it may not have been wise to bring it up.

If the team is suffering though it doesn't hurt to put him in. I mean that's pretty much like predicting the lottery in five years though, you never know if it comes to this or that. There is just so many things with that contract where if I was him, I'd be firing my agent.

Real life sports teams have real factual money to deal with, we do not. No sports teams don't keep GM's in fi they suck, which is why we were surprised to see you guys back him up. The league would find someone before you went in, that wouldn't be an issue. Let's not forget about the VHLM history of GM'ing with you, that part of the resume and the very knee jerk retirement don't bode will. Yes there are better options out there and yes I believe a new GM is the way to go. However, if it comes through trade it will be qual value because another team doesn't deserve to lose out. If it comes through FA, then Seattle got bailed out finally. If it comes within the team already there, well be luck of the draw they may or may not go upwards.

Of for sure his contract is the one thing the team has a leg up on. If he isn't playing well all they have to do is play the backup 21% of the snaps and his contract goes down.

Given wasn't the word you used to end the phrase though, you rhyme the last word with your initial word, silly kesler17.