Gooningitup 1,290 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 S49.3.5mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel 565 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 (edited) S49: $ 4 000 000 Edited May 17, 2016 by Daniel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boubabi 4,725 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 @Draper Isnt there a rule against jumping the salary for inactives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molholt 2,183 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 1 minute ago, boubabi said: @Draper Isnt there a rule against jumping the salary for inactives I thought so as well, but the rule they changed was that you can't offer inactives bonuses - apparently you can still do this nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,724 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 No you can't do this nonsense. I don't think it was added to the rulebook but I remember that a team can't offer more than 500k on the previous offered team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molholt 2,183 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Just now, Kendrick said: No you can't do this nonsense. I don't think it was added to the rulebook but I remember that a team can't offer more than 500k on the previous offered team. Then a lot of free agency threads need to be revisited ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel 565 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Yeah I edited because I'm new and/or stupid, sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,724 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Just now, Molholt said: Then a lot of free agency threads need to be revisited ha That they should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Admin Will 4,604 Posted May 17, 2016 Senior Admin Share Posted May 17, 2016 18 minutes ago, Molholt said: I thought so as well, but the rule they changed was that you can't offer inactives bonuses - apparently you can still do this nonsense. At this time, based on what we wrote in the rule change you mentioned, that is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molholt 2,183 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Just now, Draper said: At this time, based on what we wrote in the rule change you mentioned, that is correct. Hello loophole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Admin Will 4,604 Posted May 19, 2016 Senior Admin Share Posted May 19, 2016 property Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts