Admin Victor 10,536 Posted February 19, 2016 Admin Share Posted February 19, 2016 We all know the dark secret of Campbell's save %... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JardyB10 4,834 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) Also, if I REALLY wanted to make an inane argument about how "higher shot total = higher save percentage," than I would look at QUE G vs. TOR G. They have identical TPE, and nearly identical builds, but TOR G saw 300 more shots, and had a decently higher save percentage. So my argument would be that this is "proof" that more shots are actually beneficial to a goalie numbers. My real point being it's a thin argument either way. Although honestly, if their SV% was literally identical, I would probably go with the one with more saves, personally. Edited February 19, 2016 by JardyB10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,536 Posted February 19, 2016 Admin Share Posted February 19, 2016 1 minute ago, JardyB10 said: Also, if I REALLY wanted to make an inane argument about how "higher shot total = higher save percentage," than I would look at QUE G vs. TOR G. They have identical TPE, and nearly identical builds, but TOR G saw 300 more shots, and had a decently higher save percentage. So my argument would be that this is "proof" that more shots are actually beneficial to a goalie numbers. My real point being it's a thin argument either way. You forget however that TOR G worked with the likes of Shaw, Labatte, and LeBeau. #intangibles #experience JardyB10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now