What Would You Grade This Now?

[TheLastOlympian07 2,388]

Using the old grading system of 

 

/3 effort

/2 look

/1 creativity 

 

what would you grade sigs that withstood the tests of time, ex. ones that are still around on the old sites. I will post a sig and you will grade it and after awhile I will show you the grade it actually got. sound like fun? 

 

[scoop 3,386]

2.5

1

1

[Higgins 3,618]

sig/sig

[scoop 3,386]

Just now, Higgins said:

sig/sig

nice

[Phil 5,113]

banned/6

[Beketov 8,960]

time period and maker have a lot of effect on grading, always have. What was perfect effort in S1 wouldn't get half points in S40. In any case:

 

2/3

1/2

1/1

 

TOTAL: 4/6

[TheLastOlympian07 2,388]

Bushito made that sig, Squinty and Frank graded it:

 

Effort: 3/3
Effort is def there.

Look: 1.25/2
Sorry but this is definitely not one of your better ones. THe lighting is in all the wrong places, should be on the render, not on a random spot in the bg. also stocks are just covering up the render and it throws off the flow. Too dark in some areas too. Text is alright, has potential to be great though.

Creativity: 1/1
Sure

5.25/6

 

Effort: 3/3 Yep

Look: 1.25/2 The stock you chose to you for lighting ruins this for me. I love what you have up until that point. I would have prefered to see something more general then spotted lighting. 

Creativity: 1/1 yep

Overall: 5.25/6 - Final 5/6

 

NEW SIG:

 

[jack 498]

effort: 2/3

look: 1.5/2

creativity: 1/1

[gorlab 4,321]

i'd give it a 6/6.

[Beketov 8,960]

2.5/3

1.5/3

1/1

 

TOTAL: 5/6