Victor

Tomorrow is indeed the end of week 2 BTW.

Klinsmann got fired what?

yeah jeez, Gretzky on a basketball team? At his age?! I'm sorry I just came in to see who won the cup and all I got was Crosby bullshit.

Yeah you better Oh for signing in Seattle.

No I was talking about my shitty brother @JardyB10

@Dangles13 wtf?! Also Petenis has Klajums' number.

Also nah can't afford him with Mikaelson anyway.

I blame gorlab for everything. Also should have waited til second players to trade 7th rounders.

Haven't missed playoffs since S29. Also, more importantly this means Karnage to NY.

does it though? He has the lowest TPE of all other top goalie contenders.

bit early for that no?

Yukon won't. First-gens only.

I couldn't think of who else qualifies as young player from any half decent team tbh.

Yeah but you don't just ignore one of your LRs. Ideally activity doubles. At worst it should be multiply by 1.5.

Von Karma always hated Stockholm

Dunno, I think it boils down more to the fact that no matter how questionable their character, Robben, van Persie, and Sneijder are better than any current player and just haven't been replaced. It's a small country at the end of the day with a famous past but not every generation can be successful.

Maybe they're just avenging their brother being on the bench.

oh baby

savage

If you asked me, I wouldn't mention it in recruitment at all. Much for the same reason my proposal for junior players was shut down, it IS probably too confusing for new members. I don't think it should be referenced in any new member guides, just something to come into contact with later. Unless there's a valid case that it would be an effective recruitment tool that is.

Obviously recruitment is relevant but not everything has to be geared towards it. In fact, how do you even make a league-wide change to benefit recruitment? Recruitment, not retention. Recruitment means appealing to outsiders. Nothing we do inside makes any sense to outsiders to start with so wtf? Recruitment ideas I get, but recruitment is a background process, when has anything ever been implemented rule change-wise to benefit recruitment? Is that even physically possible? It's not like we're a marketing agency, out product is pretty intangible anyway.... Seriously guys, how is this even a counter-argument?

more players = more active LRs more players = less shitty teams, more parity the state of the VHLM, most of its LRs, as well as 30-40% of VHL teams from season to season is not a good look.

Poor Advantage.

bit of a low scoring sim but 3 out of 4 points isn't too bad