Victor

I had an injection of perfectly legal ego boost.

If I took so much credit for every term I coined in the VHL, everyone would cheer against my teams too.

Oh this one is on.

Wow. Attitude-wise, Quebec deserves this, but on pure talent, one underdog finals appearance in this run is just terrible. But wow, Calgary, sublime. So many powerplays in this game, but didn't even need 'em. For WinGod, for the fans.

Yeah we don't have indexes before S18. But as I said, you don't need them.

I mean, I wish Chelsea remembered how to do it at this particular moment....

Liverpool have learned well from Man United.

the French don't have a sense of time

Well that was quick.

19 first-gens? Damn that's good.

Only need Game 5s anyway.

I never ask any questions which can not be found on this forum. Even the indexes are not necessary.

I'm just saying, your member count is flawed. We don't have 500 active members, much like the SHL doesn't have 2,000. The 500 is probably members who have been on this, the third site, i.e. one that is still just under 2 years old. The SHL's site, its second, has been running for about 75% of its history. More accurate active member counts are something like 200 and 100.

I have helped you Cowboy. For WinGod!

I mean they do win every second season based on my highly accurate sample of four seasons. Their struggles last season were overstated (basically 3 wins off the title) though I do believe that at some point keeping the same aging group of players leads to them not giving a shit anymore after all the money and trophies... but I guess there's still something left. On paper, they've probably been the best team without pause since 2011.

dunno, he was ready to knock out Slobo

do you want to fight cuz I've got gorlab on standby.

for good reason tbh, scrubs

It was just the 3 seasons before expansion. And yeah, we've gotten soft with the grading.

David Knight - will he ever recreate?

boubabi

at least it's free ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

That moment when I voted "I don't care" too. I actually might carry on the playoff system, if I lower it from 7 to 4, that will mean 5 questions can be asked (parts A are different (all 7 from other members) but part B is the same for each one) and each member will see 2. The reason for the "randomising" methods is to ensure everyone has to do some research since you can't guarantee someone you ask will know the answer. And yeah, the Bonus for sending me a question of your own will be back at some point. I currently have an unused question bank of 27 questions and since I use them randomly, I don't want someone's to get lost in the shuffle and them to never get that much needed 1 uncapped TPE.

Season 44 VHL This Week trivia is coming to a close and though Molholt's articles seem to have died, I'm quite pleased with the results. Forty members have taken part so far, and I'd estimate around 30 more than once, so drastic changes will not be made going into next season, when trivia will start at the beginning of the season, not randomly midway. What I do want to do is set up a consistent format of sending out questions, as opposed to chopping and changing every week. So I've set up a poll above with the options described below: Number method (week 1): each member PMed me two numbers from 1 to 8 and got the two questions they randomly picked Number method (week 3) each member PMed me one number from 1 to 4 and got two questions attached to that number Alternative method: members received two questions after PMing me the answer to a simple question which were Scotty Campbell in week 2 and Tuomas Tukio in week 4. There was also a fourth method used for this playoff edition but that's a one-off or will be used exclusively for the playoffs. Maybe. We'll see what the results are in this poll. Oh and let me know if you have any other suggestions or criticism.

This was pretty insightful and meaningful tbh. You should read some of eaglesfan's work.