No, but I am saying that possibility of something better is out there. Seriously, minus some stuff Victor said, I think the only arguments against considering any change are "Scotty's records" and "this doesn't need to be changed." (None of the stuff that Victor said is being reiterated by anyone else, though; they maintain that the two latter arguments are sufficient enough to treat the idea like it's shit.)
I think everyone is WAY overplaying the impact that a change such as the following would make:
Beginning in your 9th season, no banked TPE will make it through depreciation (if you have banked TPE when you depreciate, it goes away).
9th season: 13% depreciation; 4% carryover
10th season: 19% depreciation; 2% carryover
11th season: 25% depreciation; no carryover
etc.
People who are going to recreate wouldn't likely want to suffer these penalties, unless I guess they had a really good shot at some sort of record (though I believe Scotty's goals/points records would still be safe, based on the fact that no player's career average puts him closer than 90 goals/120 points of Scotty, extrapolating to a 10 season career). Maybe some others would extend their careers as well, but I don't really see what would be so wrong with that. If players who don't plan on recreating wanted to stick around for one or two more seasons, it would add more bodies in the VHL for that time.