TheDanglingCellist

I've sort of been back recently: I just have been too lazy to update or write anything. Anyway, happy to take home some hardware.

Tough loss. Nothing sucks more than scoring a hatty and failing in the process.

Holy cow did I turn it on!

Cool.

Why are the Gladiators not playing any games?

Are you going to update me?

Content: 3/3 XXX was the best player in the VHLM; in the RS and playoffs. I will never forget that series. My Gladiators will return. Grammar: 2/2 There was that which flyers noticed. Maybe I'm getting picky, but I would say here: playoffs leading scoring -> playoffs leading in the scoring department with Appearance: 1/1 No complaints from me. Overall: 6/6 Final: 6/6

Content: 3/3 Dang were the Linx good this season. Insane numbers there. Ain't a surprise that RGIII didn't get that many points given that the depth chart is so powerful. He will take off next season for sure! Grammar: 1.5/2 It would be mean to get anymore nit picky than flyersfan already did. Appearance: 1/1 Moving on. Overall: 5.5/6 Final: 6/6

Content: 3/3 If it were me, I'd be angry following a loss. Classy move. Well done. Grammar: 2/2 Didn't notice anything other than that which was already noticed. Appearance: 1/1 Very consistent. Nice. Overall: 6/6 Final: 6/6

Aelred Leskowsky Forward Points +/- This system is so mean when it comes to forwards. 10 goals to get 1 TPE and same formula for points? How does that even make sense? Nobody will ever score as many goals as points so for the most part, nobody should ever claim for goals unless they don't hit or have terrible +/-. These formulas need to be rethought.

We have to get our act together. Shut down XXX, and score some goals.

Well darn.

Awesome. I never got into these when I was drafted, but I'd love to now.

Minot, North Dakota After VHLM superstar, Simon Tremblay, made the jump the big league, pessimists, haters, trolls, and several analysts were predicting Minot as toast. These skeptics looked at Minot's roster and had little faith in the developing skills of players such as Aelred Leskowsky: a player whose scoring ability left something to be desired after scoring less than 30 goals combined in 2 seasons in the VHLM; a player who benefited from the presence of superior teammates; a player too small to be anything...well big. This season, critics be damned. The aforementioned Leskowsky has equaled his total rookie season goal scoring output with 11 goals in a mere 19 games, a fantastic spike in production. He also has 12 assists, a testament to his willingness to share the puck. His defensive play has been every bit as solid as it was last year, the season when he played a key role on one of the league's best special-teams. As for the size, he has been playing as if he were 6'4", piling up over 50 hits in this short space of time. If all that is not impressive, Leskowsky also regularly double-shifts, playing centre and wing. Now fans and analysts are wondering: what is Leskowsky's ceiling? When people saw him as a potential scorer whose raw talent outweighed the negatives in his game, he proceeded into his sophomore season as one of the league's best defensive forwards (as well as defenceman). Now, when people began to see him as a penalty-kill specialist and elite defensive player, he starts to display an offensive edge still without sacrificing anything on the backcheck. Leskowsky is beginning to look more and more like a fantastic two-way player who will one day make his mark in the VHL. As for a ceiling? The ceiling for Leskowsky is pretty much however high he wants it to be. A comparison for Leskowsky would be Toronto Maple Leafs' (NHL) prospect Frederik Gauthier, a fantastic two-way talent who risk factor is so low that his floor is third-line defensive specialist. Leskowsky can be compared so because he pretty much guarantees the Dynamo a solid defensive-forward in a worst case scenario. Somewhere in Davos, somebody is gleefully rubbing his hands together and celebrating in a drunken fashion.

Content: 3/3 - This sort of article is new to me. Good read, giving a breakdown on each NA team while talking about where you'd fit in best. Keep up the good work. Grammar: 2/2 - Not so good at English? You put the stereotypical high-school student in the dumps twenty times and then dunk him/her for good measure. Appearance: 1/1 - No complaints. Overall: 6/6 Final: 6/6