SEA/RIG; S97

[VHL Bot 3,081]

Riga receives:

Marek Nowaczyk

Simons Worst Nightmare

Seattle receives:

Severus Targaryen

This trade has been accepted by all parties and is pending league approval.

[Banackock 8,140]

Thanks for the talks @Lemorse7

 

Thanks for your efforts and presence on Seattle @Chillybro @zepheter

[Chillybro 27]

Thanks for the time Seattle, have a good season

[Lemorse7 1,021]

Welcome to the team @zepheter and @Chillybro will invite you to the discord soon or tomorrow if I crash out 

 

thanks for the talk and the season @Banackock

[Beketov 9,101]

On 12/17/1992 at 7:27 PM, Will said:

Any trade to re-acquire a player that was traded within the past 2 seasons, and has not signed a new contract, will be subject to league approval.

I mean if you guys have a reason we should allow this I would love to hear it but as it stands you aren’t really supposed to trade back a player within 2 seasons. Especially where this also involves a GM player which also needs special approval.

[Banackock 8,140]

2 hours ago, Beketov said:

I mean if you guys have a reason we should allow this I would love to hear it but as it stands you aren’t really supposed to trade back a player within 2 seasons. Especially where this also involves a GM player which also needs special approval.

Can you specially approve it? Nothing sneaky here. He needed a player last season, this one I need one. That’s all it is. 

[Banackock 8,140]

Also, why not? Is there a reason o not allow it in this case?  

[Spartan 4,531]

10 minutes ago, Banackock said:

Also, why not? Is there a reason o not allow it in this case?  

Afaik it's generally frowned upon to have a player on the same contract flipped back to the team that traded them away the following offseason, it's in the rulebook. Add on that it's a GM player, gets a bit sketch. Plus last season's trade was almost the exact same as this with the player TPE involved but RIG paid an extra 1st and 2nd, so between GM player trade scrutiny and a player being traded back on the same contract, it's looking like a veto.

[Banackock 8,140]

2 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Afaik it's generally frowned upon to have a player on the same contract flipped back to the team that traded them away the following offseason, it's in the rulebook. Add on that it's a GM player, gets a bit sketch. Plus last season's trade was almost the exact same as this with the player TPE involved but RIG paid an extra 1st and 2nd, so between GM player trade scrutiny and a player being traded back on the same contract, it's looking like a veto.

Yeah. I get it. Nothing sketch here at all but all good if so!  

[Spartan 4,531]

1 minute ago, Banackock said:

Yeah. I get it. Nothing sketch here at all but all good if so!  

I haven't formally vetoed it, I'd chat with Blues on discord if you have more thoughts or a case to make. I deferred this to them because it's not a precedent I've had to deal with often, and Bek knows it better than I do.

[Will 4,662]

4 hours ago, Beketov said:

I mean if you guys have a reason we should allow this I would love to hear it but as it stands you aren’t really supposed to trade back a player within 2 seasons. Especially where this also involves a GM player which also needs special approval.

 

Whoa I wrote this before I was born.

[Spartan 4,531]

31 minutes ago, Will said:

 

Whoa I wrote this before I was born.

Will join our LR on Discord

[Spartan 4,531]

Official ruling is a veto

 

@Lemorse7 @Banackock

[Lemorse7 1,021]

Okie

[Banackock 8,140]

1 hour ago, Spartan said:

Official ruling is a veto

 

@Lemorse7 @Banackock

Thanks for letting us know so soon!