2016/17 Football Discussion

[Victor 10,942]

Chelsea spitting hot fire at the moment - back 3 is so hot right now.

[BOOM 8,746]

Sorry Watford. 

[solas 1,951]

[Fire Tortorella 2,653]

34 minutes ago, solas said:

*snip*

 

Need more Harrys from the academy. 

[eaglesfan036 4,603]

spurs with da comeback

[Victor 10,942]

Lmao Spurs

[hedgehog337 3,483]

Lmao Dortmund and Legia

[gorlab 4,321]

spurs

 

 

 

 

lmaoooooooooo

[diamond_ace 3,112]

On 11/5/2016 at 6:59 PM, Victor said:

Chelsea spitting hot fire at the moment - back 3 is so hot right now.

This. Conte's worked magic. He's made Cahill look like a professional footballer.

[.sniffuM 1,741]

23 hours ago, hedgehog337 said:

Lmao Dortmund and Legia

 

Warszawa?

[hedgehog337 3,483]

1 minute ago, .sniffuM said:

 

Warszawa?

 

yes

[.sniffuM 1,741]

Just now, hedgehog337 said:

 

yes

 

ayyyyyy its lit

[hedgehog337 3,483]

Lmao at Bayern as well. 

[diamond_ace 3,112]

CHELSEA! Top of the league still, comeback over Spurs was fantastic

[Victor 10,942]

Victor Moses, we are not worthy.

[gorlab 4,321]

On 11/19/2016 at 6:01 PM, eaglesfan036 said:

spurs with da comeback

[Fire Tortorella 2,653]

For those who know the history of soccer better than me, would it be fair to say that Chelsea and Tottenham were on a similar level before Abramovich? Just looking at their trophies and where they finished in the table, seems like they both were clubs that had moments of success towards the top of the table but were largely mediocre.

[Victor 10,942]

29 minutes ago, flyersfan1493 said:

For those who know the history of soccer better than me, would it be fair to say that Chelsea and Tottenham were on a similar level before Abramovich? Just looking at their trophies and where they finished in the table, seems like they both were clubs that had moments of success towards the top of the table but were largely mediocre.

Yeah I think so. I think both were around Everton level. Man City were worse than all of the above before the money.

 

Otherwise, the teams with the "history" are Man Utd, Arsenal, and Liverpool, and of course also not without using financial power, just different back in the day.

[BOOM 8,746]

I saw a headline but not the event itself.... did Pogba do a great dive or something?

[Victor 10,942]

2 hours ago, boom said:

I saw a headline but not the event itself.... did Pogba do a great dive or something?

It was exquisite. Worth every penny.

[BOOM 8,746]

Yeah, finally got a chance to see it. There's been plenty worse. I found Jose's reaction more entertaining.

[diamond_ace 3,112]

On 11/27/2016 at 10:57 AM, Victor said:

Yeah I think so. I think both were around Everton level. Man City were worse than all of the above before the money.

 

Otherwise, the teams with the "history" are Man Utd, Arsenal, and Liverpool, and of course also not without using financial power, just different back in the day.

Back in the day, Leeds were fair as well, Pompey were regularly a Prem club, money has worked well for those who have it but has also hurt the ones who don't.

[Victor 10,942]

2 hours ago, diamond_ace said:

Back in the day, Leeds were fair as well, Pompey were regularly a Prem club, money has worked well for those who have it but has also hurt the ones who don't.

But those who don't have it now had it before which was sort of the point I was making. There's a lot of butthurt stemming from the fact some old big clubs couldn't keep up. As it stands, Man U are heading the same way as well.

[diamond_ace 3,112]

1 hour ago, Victor said:

But those who don't have it now had it before which was sort of the point I was making. There's a lot of butthurt stemming from the fact some old big clubs couldn't keep up. As it stands, Man U are heading the same way as well.

I would very much like to see that

[Phil 5,119]

57 years ago today, Bill Shankly became Liverpool FC's manager <3 <3