Kendrick 4,741 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) I have 340 TPE that isn't applied? I find that hard to believe. Maybe TPA means something else @XaviYEAH! Woods Edited November 13, 2015 by Kendrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachReilly 688 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) I think it's because you have had some depreciation and also have some banked. Any depreciated points count as minus TPE, I think? it probably just takes however many TPE it would take for a new player to get to your attribute level... ie. a 99 = 116 TPA Edited November 13, 2015 by CoachReilly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,741 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 I think it's because you have had some depreciation and also have some banked. Any depreciated points count as minus TPE, I think? it probably just takes however many TPE it would take for a new player to get to your attribute level... ie. a 99 = 116 TPA Yeah we went over it in chat. Seems like two years of regression does a huge number on people with large TPE earning ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) I have 340 TPE that isn't applied? I find that hard to believe. Maybe TPA means something else @XaviYEAH! Woods FEAR THE TPA GOD, OR HE WILL STRIKE THEE DOWN WITH MATH! Edited November 13, 2015 by XaviYEAH! Woods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachReilly 688 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 YES! YES! YES! YEAH! YEAH! YEAH! but yeah, if you think about it -- max you would EVER do, if you were a total pervert, is 1,044 TPA (that's 99 leadership, 99 discipline, 99 strength, 99 defense, 99 skating, 99 scoring, 99 passing, 99 puck handling, 99 checking for a defender) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank 5,196 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Da fuck is a tpa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachReilly 688 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 TP APPLIED FRANK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank 5,196 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 From some arbitrary date? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboyinAmerica 2,887 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Top 5 for TPA and just outside the Top 10 for TPE. I'll take it! (And yes, I understand what you did for TPA, and I appreciate the effort) Tagger 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 From some arbitrary date? From the update that was done by Draper prior to the season start. I've added a bit more to the top post just so I've made it clear what TPA is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 UPDATED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boubabi 4,725 Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 reigning tpa king till I die Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,934 Posted November 26, 2015 Admin Share Posted November 26, 2015 YES! YES! YES! YEAH! YEAH! YEAH! but yeah, if you think about it -- max you would EVER do, if you were a total pervert, is 1,044 TPA (that's 99 leadership, 99 discipline, 99 strength, 99 defense, 99 skating, 99 scoring, 99 passing, 99 puck handling, 99 checking for a defender) Leadership and discipline don't depreciate. soz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboyinAmerica 2,887 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Wait, is that actually the case? Give me all the Leadership! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,741 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 O'Malley did some super human depreciation avoidance or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 O'Malley did some super human depreciation avoidance or what? Since I only really look at the attributes for this stuff, I don't know the reasons behind them. I can have a rough guess though, looking at your TPA's in the Season 44 Playoffs (Your last playoffs before regression), you had 26 more TPA than O'Malley, so if he started banking earlier than you then maybe there is a chance you've lost quite a bit more points than him through regression (especially since the pair of you are dealing with 99's for the most part). Also, if Victor is right about discipline being immune from regression, then both of you should have a talk with the commisssioners who did them since you're both below what you were by the Season 44 Playoffs in that attribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boubabi 4,725 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 I only see 1 reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,741 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Pretty sure attributes you update are all up for depreciated besides Experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Pretty sure attributes you update are all up for depreciated besides Experience. If that is the case then they should amend the depreciation rules, because they mention that Discipline doesn't get affected by depreciation Attribute DepreciationYour TPE level will not be depreciated, only your attributes will be. Experience, Discipline and Leadership will not be subject to depreciation. Edited November 26, 2015 by XaviYEAH! Woods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Admin Will 4,660 Posted November 27, 2015 Senior Admin Share Posted November 27, 2015 Indeed, discipline isn't supposed to be depreciated. I will fix you up. I too was wondering why O'Malley's TPA was so much higher than Richardson, but I looked into his depreciated and was surprised to find that with his number is supposed to be even higher with discipline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,741 Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 Indeed, discipline isn't supposed to be depreciated. I will fix you up. I too was wondering why O'Malley's TPA was so much higher than Richardson, but I looked into his depreciated and was surprised to find that with his number is supposed to be even higher with discipline Higher number, but same gap. The reason he is higher isn't because he started banking before me @XaviYEAH! Woods, it's actually because he spent more of the banked he had than I did. I left a good chunk of TPE banked for next season too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Updated once more yo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie 438 Posted December 3, 2015 Author Share Posted December 3, 2015 Nice format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 The TPA and TPE tables have been updated, leader tabs will be updated at a later time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tagger 2,722 Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 The Team Indexes have been updated, will update leaders tab after off-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now