Jump to content

GM 114: Calgary Wranglers vs. Malmo Nighthawks

VHL Games

By VHL Games
in S68 Games

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Commissioner
Beketov

Beketov 8,938

Posted
  • Commissioner
Posted

Now that's the kind of game I've been trying to see this season! Always nice to pick up a hat trick, especially with @fonziGG playing amazingly.

 

25 more goals!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bushito

Bushito 1,945

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, Phil said:

6 game pointless streak :(

Yeah the Wranglers are on quite a losing streak. I have a feeling some settings were fucked with, no way the highest TPE starting 11 in the league should be a lotto team even with STHS fuckery

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DollarAndADream

DollarAndADream 3,356

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Bushito said:

Yeah the Wranglers are on quite a losing streak. I have a feeling some settings were fucked with, no way the highest TPE starting 11 in the league should be a lotto team even with STHS fuckery

Doesn't make sense at all.

 

1  high TPE player, maybe. But a whole TPE, consistently losing? Wtf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Commissioner
Beketov

Beketov 8,938

Posted
  • Commissioner
Posted
15 hours ago, Bushito said:

Yeah the Wranglers are on quite a losing streak. I have a feeling some settings were fucked with, no way the highest TPE starting 11 in the league should be a lotto team even with STHS fuckery

And there’s the conspiracy I was waiting for. Knew I couldn’t score my only hat trick of the season against you without it coming out haha.

 

@Devise  can go compare the sliders to the old ones if you’re so sure; they weren’t touched. Even if they were (spoilers: I’d be scoring way more if they were) sliders wouldn’t affect specific teams. STHS just doesn’t like your team chemistry I guess, it happens. Look at Vancouver a few seasons ago. Sometimes good on paper doesn’t translate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Admin
Victor

Victor 10,828

Posted
  • Admin
Posted
7 hours ago, DollarAndADream said:

Doesn't make sense at all.

 

1  high TPE player, maybe. But a whole TPE, consistently losing? Wtf.

You not banking against depreciation doesn't help, now that Ironside is a 500 TPA player instead of 1,200 TPE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Quik

Quik 4,113

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Bushito said:

Yeah the Wranglers are on quite a losing streak. I have a feeling some settings were fucked with, no way the highest TPE starting 11 in the league should be a lotto team even with STHS fuckery


I’m 99% sure Helsinki has the highest average TPA, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DollarAndADream

DollarAndADream 3,356

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Victor said:

You not banking against depreciation doesn't help, now that Ironside is a 500 TPA player instead of 1,200 TPE.

I've never banked for it before. None of my players have been impacted too bad from it. 

 

With my player's attributes they should still be performing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Commissioner
Beketov

Beketov 8,938

Posted
  • Commissioner
Posted
3 minutes ago, DollarAndADream said:

I've never banked for it before. None of my players have been impacted too bad from it. 

More TPA means depreciation affects you more though. 585 TPA when aiming to be the team’s main threat is going to be problematic.

 

Still though, you should indeed be performing better. My hunch is like chemistry. Sorta like how you and I didn’t do well on the same line even though we were both top players. Or how Borwinn and I did amazing in S66 together but terrible last season after his re-roll. Linemates have a huge impact, far larger than simply TPE does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DollarAndADream

DollarAndADream 3,356

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Beketov said:

More TPA means depreciation affects you more though. 585 TPA when aiming to be the team’s main threat is going to be problematic.

 

Still though, you should indeed be performing better. My hunch is like chemistry. Sorta like how you and I didn’t do well on the same line even though we were both top players. Or how Borwinn and I did amazing in S66 together but terrible last season after his re-roll. Linemates have a huge impact, far larger than simply TPE does.

Calgary as a team should just be doing better in general. Started well as usual then declined. 

 

Twinger I'm not surprised with. He sucked in his prime too, but I figured switching to D might spark something. It did to start off, but then he slowed with the rest of the team.

 

Ironside I was never worried out, but he should definitely still be doing better. Although he's retired after this season so its whatever to me. He probably should have had a better career, but it's all good.

 

None of my players will ever live up to Parechkin and I'm fine with that. Lmao. Too high of a bar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hedgehog337

hedgehog337 3,480

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, DollarAndADream said:

Calgary as a team should just be doing better in general. Started well as usual then declined. 

 

Twinger I'm not surprised with. He sucked in his prime too, but I figured switching to D might spark something. It did to start off, but then he slowed with the rest of the team.

 

Ironside I was never worried out, but he should definitely still be doing better. Although he's retired after this season so its whatever to me. He probably should have had a better career, but it's all good.

 

None of my players will ever live up to Parechkin and I'm fine with that. Lmao. Too high of a bar. 

 

585 TPA is kinda meh nowadays with a big chunk of players having 1000+ I'm not saying it's impossible to have a solid season, but def harder. 

 

I'm way more surprised about Dills and Ylonen never took off as of this moment. I figured it out they should do big things which could propel Calgary to a Victory Cup, even took Ylo in fantasy. That's really a headscratching moment, prolly Esso gotta up scoring to 90 for a bigger effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Esso2264

Esso2264 774

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, hedgehog337 said:

 

585 TPA is kinda meh nowadays with a big chunk of players having 1000+ I'm not saying it's impossible to have a solid season, but def harder. 

 

I'm way more surprised about Dills and Ylonen never took off as of this moment. I figured it out they should do big things which could propel Calgary to a Victory Cup, even took Ylo in fantasy. That's really a headscratching moment, prolly Esso gotta up scoring to 90 for a bigger effect.

F im banking for regression

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...