Jump to content

Victor

Admin
  • Posts

    28,865
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    275

Everything posted by Victor

  1. Yukon claims Sampson.
  2. Branching off from the main proposal, and after a fairly unrelated discussion with my Yukon Rush peeps ( @Tixe @Dangles13 @Digg ), I came to this realisation: Second players addresses a key issue in not having enough to do during the week but the people most affected by that issue (new members) won't actually feel the benefits until it may be too late. Because of the 3-season restriction, which I do believe is necessary, if we implemented this right now (which we won't, don't worry), S50 and even S49 draftees would have to wait until S51/52 at the earliest to create another player. Which isn't that long but still altogether adds up to approaching half a year IRL. So, my suggestion to address this: give new members the option of creating a second player soon after joining. The caveat: this player would start with lower attributes (I'm thinking as low as 20), maybe even with some sort of update scale from 30 to 40, and maybe a limit on how much TPE can be spent on that player. In the end, that player will still join the S53 draft class (for an S50 draftee), but will have been in existence for a bit longer. A few resulting issues: 1. Where will these players play before they become equivalents of normal players? - I say still the VHLM. 2. What about carryover? - Yeah so obviously this will give these players extra TPE due to the earlier start but I don't really care - if they break some TPE record, good for them, it's still be a challenge, and well I feel it's a minor hand-out really for new members who start at a disadvantaged position anyway. 3. Should there be an attribute cap? - I think it'd be silly to allow someone to just put all TPE in scoring and then become draft-eligible with 99 scoring in the VHLM. One solution is instituting an update scale between 20 and 40, while I'd also say these players should be encouraged to get to 40 in all attributes before starting to max out the others. * * - speaking of 40, any attributes still below 40 at the day of actual draft eligibility (in this hypothetical scenario it would be S52 trade deadline), would be bumped up to 40 anyway to regain equal footing. Not the best worded idea possibly with some work to do, but IMHO it has legs.
  3. fine fine edited I'm happy if donations are the main criticism at this point.
  4. god damn we're bad this isn't some all-time greatest team
  5. dat 6. Vikings , STO C1 1 (DAV LW3, STO D5) at 3:38 7. Vikings , DAV LW3 2 (STO D4, STO C3) at 19:44 (PP)
  6. Davos would arguably be the most promising team in Europe, if only they could get along.
  7. Damn we have just been served justice.
  8. I hope you both get traded to Vasteras.
  9. Pittsburgh because only teams I saw win the cup can win the cup (I followed hockey from 2007 to 2012)
  10. So you donate $20 and it's the exact same system as it is now, except you get double the rewards (since two players), Then you can donate another $20 and $10 worth of rewards goes to one player and $10 worth to the other. So an extra doubles week each if you donate $40.
  11. User Name: VictorTHE FINALS San Jose vs PittsburghWinner: Pittsburgh# of Games: 6
  12. looks like a lot more players than usual will hit 100 points this year.
  13. Updated the OP with the additional discussion had here. Added a section on carryover, cleared up how earning TPE works, and updated the trading rule with Streetlight's suggestion. Also changed the implementation strategy.
  14. Still accepting numbers and answers for 2-3 more days!
  15. Crushes seems about right as I expect any European playoff series to be like a drunk sumo wrestling match.
  16. So close to 8 seasons
  17. So 14 shots?
  18. Fuck you, Calgary is more important than my evil persona.
  19. #BringBackSTOG
  20. I'll aim to retire before you get to the VHL then.
  21. I'm so sorry.
  22. Ruutu, stahp
  23. noooooo fate is unavoidable, he'll tie me in CLEGANEBOWLS again, noooooo
  24. maybe you do you just can't see them at the top
  25. might be the shootout with the best shot percentage ever
×
×
  • Create New...