Victor

should fire late GMs and make the GM replacement process as awkward and unfair as possible

Pepsi >

The best Hamilton.

the real question is would you be willing to give up a 1st overall pick to GM?

Woot all the TPE. @Smarch im coming for you.

these are causes I can get behind

But it's not black and white. All these situations can be dealt with differently and still correctly. I'm not saying they were, as I don't know about Cologne and Toronto was definitely the product of Seattle but I don't think there was a better solution for Seattle which wouldn't have been an overpayment.

@Draper you're reading this, give us a quick draw. Or Jardy.

It is indeed, only 3 players created since the 28th have put a recruiter. I guess we can include Claudio as well but he forced the older Gow upon us so maybe not.

I mean, don't see how TPE levels affect that tbh.

I can't comment on the reasoning behind the Cologne transition if I wasn't involved, can I? It looks wrong but I want to give the benefit of the doubt to those that made it. And for the 115th time, Komarov was not an overpayment. If anything, that should be the standard going forward but that can't be guaranteed because the chances of every GM falling at or about their right draft position for their team aren't great.

I have more than your scrub but the Jew has overtaken me.

Hmm @Kendrick @eaglesfan036 How shall we split this.

Davos gets the next 5 first overall picks and McJustice gets 1000 extra TPE. Doubt that would be enough to appease you though.

Legend.

Can't open PMs on my phone so I'm acknowledging you here.

Its all about physical intimidation actually.

That's a bannin'

I clearly said I don't know what the reasoning for Greg was? Also don't make this out as if I'm just making this up right now or twisting it, I'm just telling you what the reasoning was at the time. Also stevo was drafted after the forfeited picks in S46 so they still had value.

you're shit coloured, you have no authority here

They didn't have a S45 1st which was Molholt's draft year but they did have one in S46 and it was a S46 2nd they ended up giving up. I don't think that was or should be the reasoning.

It appears I never opened your PM, probably only saw the email about it, so updated. You did get an answer wrong one week I believe, not that it affects anything.

well this has absolutely flown by

I have no idea how Greg ended up in Cologne tbh as I was barely here in S46. I'm not sure I'd even want to re-do Seattle because Mike wouldn't have recreated so we weren't taking a player from the draft really, plus it wasn't clear how active he would be TPE-wise. Molholt is the only incorrect valuation as I see it but then this was probably a case of not fucking over Toronto more, feeling guilty for not making Mike GM there when we had the chance, and the fact that it was at the same time as the Seattle GM change and it would have been difficult to have one giving up a 1st and one a 2nd. It's not a perfect system but I don't see how it ever can be. One side can point out all the flaws of every transition, especially with the benefit of hindsight, but as shown above, all these decisions have merit and aren't made on a whim.