sterling

Correct

Correct

I agree with this assessment

+4

RIP @JardyB10 probably rigged the site to go down so he could go on a Saskatchewan bender

It's okay I'll teach you 'how to win' in Japanese

Good job @hedgehog337 and good luck

Again that's not true, I tend to agree with a lot of ideas I like and disagree with what I consider bad ideas. I have done everything in the league and had nothing but successful players so I'd argue I know what I'm talking about. If you think that's arrogant than that's that. And yes you do attack in your posts as opposed to use facts.

And for argument's sake, since @eaglesfan036 and @Jericho like to attack my character instead of having a logical argument, I would find this change more palatable of it were accompanied by an increase to career length and changes to the depreciation system. With that said, I still don't think your argument is valid based on a few high TPE earning members who can max their attributes out to 99 at present meanwhile the rest of us can't and won't. The only tennant of your argument was that a 569 TPE player led the league in goals last season which is a blasphemy to a lot of you, but not to me.

I've actually made a lot of valid points, but good try.

I'm also not entirely sure why a lot of you are writing novels to disagree with me, this is purely my opinion and I understand how many people don't share my point of view. I do, so slag off

I didn't say I was leaving The league I said I wasn't recreating because of the changes that have been made to pension, update scale and the 2 player system. I can decide to leave when I want and after being here for 10 years I'd rather not have a player that is below average. The original pension plan was a way to keep older members here and I feel the changes have not made it worthwhile to create another player.

He's halfway through his career already and has 312 TPE? Seems like he won't get past 700 and keep in mind he has depreciation to worry about

Its very simple - people who earn less TPE have a reduced ability to make good players because it costs more TPE to add to attributes. AKA TPE is worth less. The people who have the least of it are affected the most. Why do you keep asking this question when it has been answered?

I think we need to define a 'welfare' player because a lot of 'welfare' players contribute to the league in other ways (other than doing point tasks). I doubt a true welfare player could eclipse 700 TPE without other contributions. There is obviously a very bitter minority that sees welfare players as the league's main problem, which is unfortunate.

Again, I've stated my opinion many times that the league needs to be focusing on new members and not on changing things that have worked for the entirety of the league. Two players was a very cheap band-aid to a larger problem and when I noted these scale changes would alienate welfare players even more so my concerns were easily dismissed. like I've said, when you've done point tasks and other roles in the league for ten years there should some understanding and respect of your former contributions

I don't react well to poorly thought out ideas that don't target the real problems in the league, no. And I've been here long enough and led the league so my opinions are valid despite your ad hominems. I should also add that I personally helped to foster many of the changes that made this league successful for 10 years

Well you get your wish @jRuutu - I'm not recreating

I'm inclined to agree with @Molholt

@Kyle and Anderson in the same day?!

+4

thought it was most successful not most active

Was GM of the Wranglers in S18-19, among other seasons

#10 seems like a stunning lack of success for 11 seasons of work

Good for my fantasy team though