Spartan

21 minutes ago, Grape said:

Well you can skip the intro part it's alright : )

Why did I watch a harpy lay an egg

Just now, Grape said:

That's not episode 6

 

??

4 minutes ago, Grape said:

Monster Musume Episode 6

Find Jesus holy shit. I'm 22 seconds in, there's no fucking shot man. I'm canceling this contract by abusing my admin powers.

edit: I had to crop this image too to save everyone else

Straight to Warsaw (in S94)

@Grape what anime episode am I watching

2 minutes ago, Mysterious_Fish said:

All are good, I would say Hugo Boss deserves to be a nominee tho

Does he? Of 12 goalies with 20 or more starts, he's 8th in SV % and 6th in GAA.

37 minutes ago, Ricer13 said:

I’m going to refrain from this discussion.

Is there a particular reason why? Even if you're an interim, you're free to discuss.

@VHLM GM award discussion is now open outside playoff MVP. Please review all threads, bring up nominees not already mentioned, and begin discussions on worthy winners.

Also please bring up nominees for Top GM below!

Jorgen Lovstrom (PHI) - 48-8-4, .918 SV%, 2.34 GAA, 3 SO

Bric Sheithaus (LVA) - 15 G, 81 A, 96 P, +35, 86 PIM, 237 HIT, 149 SB

Jean-Pierre Devote (SDM) - 52 G, 54 A, 106 P, +15, 54 PIM, 139 HIT, 58 SB

Aanarsi Reingaard (HFX) - 46 G, 45 A, 91 P, -18, 41 PIM, 134 HIT, 45 SB

Bric Sheithaus (LVA) - 15 G, 81 A, 96 P, +35, 86 PIM, 237 HIT, 149 SB

Enn Jinn (PHI) - 21 G, 68 A, 89 P, +43, 86 PIM, 138 HIT, 128 SB

Free Gorlab (MEX) - 30 G, 48 A, 78 P, +17, 86 PIM, 205 HIT, 143 SB

Benejamin Abenduct (HOU) - 23 G, 58 A, 81 P, +13, 78 PIM, 170 HIT, 100 SB (only 68 GP)

Elle Aura Ashe (LVA) - 48 G, 52 A, 100 P, +41, 42 PIM, 151 HIT, 19 SB

Jean-Pierre Devote (SDM) - 52 G, 54 A, 106 P, +15, 54 PIM, 139 HIT, 58 SB

Wayne Shotzky (OTT) - 48 G, 63 A, 111 P, +2, 42 PIM, 128 HIT, 36 SB

Vanuza Kolesinska (MIA) - 31 G, 48 A, 79 P, +7, 50 PIM, 149 HIT, 23 SB

Jorgen Lovstrom (PHI) - 48-8-4, .918 SV%, 2.34 GAA, 3 SO

Aleksanteri Kaskiniemi-Kekkonen (MEX) - 39-24-4, .905 SV%, 2.63 GAA, 1 SO

Samuel Wazinski (SDM) - 35-22-7, .904 SV%, 2.91 GAA, 2 SO

Just now, Banackock said:

That wasn’t a broken rule? Everyone, quick. Put your PPE on. Spartan is coming!! 
 

Said nothing about broken rules, just about "one mistake" when they seem to be adding up. Not like you to miss things after being in the role for this long.

Just now, Banackock said:

Just one mistake. Glad you’re here though Spartan! You never miss an opportunity when it comes to me

Happy to pitch in mate. Arbitration rules weren't an oversight on your part either?

So if the punishment is still just reduced odds but not a punishment to overall position, couldn't a team egregiously tank (perhaps doubling bot starts and losing a majority of those starts) and guarantee 2nd overall at worst in a class with 2 elite players? Almost like the situation this season?

We had the warning with WAR/CGY that further infractions would be punished more harshly since it was one of the first instances with the rule being broken and also punished, when do we hit the threshold of actively punishing teams that break these rules?

59 minutes ago, Banackock said:

Damn, I reported this to Bek as an honest mistake. He was on the 10th game for lines and I just rolled with the same lines so he carried over a shit ton until I caught it. 
 

(2nd overall just makes my life easier, ya know?)

Seems like even Bana recognizes this tactic? Multiple "honest" mistakes this season for a very tenured GM....

One more game

Just now, Beketov said:

Mikko Lahtinen Arena, gotcha.

You were the simmer, could have changed it

If we win game 6 and 7, I'll have next season's simmer rename our arena to Jarmo Ruutu Arena

2 hours ago, BOOM said:

6. Do you feel good about your player? 

 

I haven't felt good about one of my players since Tordahl retired.

Voss??? C'mon, you've had some studs since Tordahl, cut yourself some slack. You make fantastic players, don't let anyone tell yourself otherwise.

Shit's cursed

6 hours ago, Daniel Janser said:

I think by now it is a 'Spartan cannot win' meme

By now? You're like 10 seasons late. 

Brutal

I'd run through a wall now

2 minutes ago, Daniel Janser said:

How do you prove a negative though? This is why in western countries 'innocent until proven guilty' is applied. Just to be clear, I am all for filtering out the bad apples and that some scrutiny from the updaters etc is absolutely valid. I am also aware that this is not a court of law or anything. All I wish to point out is, that it is difficult to prove a negative. I for example write my articles directly into the forum without using Word or any other software (except wordcounter). If one of my articles were to be flagged as AI generated, how would I prove that it wasn't? Would I need to record me writing the article? That would be two hours of very tedious video footage observing me rearranging sentences and so on and certainly a pain in the backside for whoever has to review it. And would that even be enough? After all, I could have the AI generated text on one monitor (or on my laptop) and record the other one where I retype said article (not trying to give ideas here to the part of the community who tries to get TPE for AI created content).  

My first suggestion would be to bring up previously written articles that somewhat mirror the writing style he claims to have been consistent with the denied article. Second might be to go back to Grammerly or whatever tool he uses since sometimes I think they leave a history of recent pieces reviewed?

As you said it's not a court of law, we don't have that sort of "innocent until proven guilty" with what you claim for TPE. If something looks off and updaters agree, then the user can find some way to communicate with us and explain how our analysis of their work is wrong and can provide more details.