Jump to content

Shindigs

Inactive
  • Posts

    2,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Everything posted by Shindigs

  1. Gah, fine. $42 the meaning of life the universe and everything, according to "The Hitchhikers Guide to Clue"
  2. $26 Because that's a number a Swedish defenseman might use.
  3. $20 Is anyone else doing @ instead of $ on muscle memory?
  4. I mean you did say that if someone asked about the meta it would be at least a 45min episode, and I did ask about the meta. So it was to be expected, really.
  5. #HYPE Now I know what I'll listen to before bed. You can't claim that a nodesode is ASMR, but maybe profanities soothe me? Also 51minute "node"sode. That is one thicc node if you ask me. @JardyB10
  6. $17 which also just so happen to be my number in juniors.
  7. Congratulations!
  8. Oh that makes perfect sense. I totally missed that, haven't watched the show in at least a decade at this point. Though to be fair that goes for basically every TV show at this point.
  9. $16
  10. Not so much actually. But it's just one of the classic phonetic joke names.
  11. $15
  12. $11 #TeamClue @MubbleFubbles
  13. Fine, $12
  14. $5.50 In-depth draft analysis of the prospect: The Board Game Clue on Skates @MubbleFubbles
  15. Credit where credit is due. Re-saving it as jpg does make it look a lot more legit. Pretty clever, almost like something a Velociraptor would do...
  16. 4.20$ #OnionHype
  17. 2 fiddy! (2.50$)
  18. You're on pace for 4 in 20. That's at least a moral victory. You know your season is screwed when Simon starts giving you pity. Miami had all 3 stars in the game vs SSK that we lost 4-2. He's literally starting to give us participation awards. Ouch!
  19. Yeah, I figured as much as it would be quite open to be abused with the wrong intentions.
  20. Question: As someone who actually enjoys being a memelord doing my weekly TPE tasks. Is it possible to give away my free week to someone else in the spirit of giving, as I won't claim it, or is that a no?
  21. *Swedish Intensifies* Share it with @dylanjj37 . Happy Holidays all!
  22. I mean there is so damn high CHA going on in that character arc, it's almost breaking muh immershun. Pretty sure at least half of what you say in your podcasts count as some form of Dissonant Whispers. Not to mention your magic item "slightly used underwear" that cast a 9th level Stinking Cloud as a bonus action. Only a bard could combine such powers... Besides every good party needs a dwarf (both kinds of parties). If for no other reason than to get to reuse LotR quotes and other short-jokes.
  23. I mean I'm not going to argue with that. Yeah, I've largely flipped my viewpoint of this over the last few days or however long it's been. The argument for the higher cap is to make players like Bo have a shot at a beast 2nd season in the VHLM. But they only need that to make up for being pummeled by insta-capped 200 TPE recreates. But if Bo stays one more season. Then Bo is the 200 TPE "recreate" that pummels the next generation of 1st gens who now also want to stay 1 more year to pummel the next generation of new gens. And the cycle continues. After a very constructive chat with @Horcrux about it. As well as going back and reading her MS on the subject. It made me realize that I was trying to solve Bo's problem in a selfish manner instead of actually thinking about the underlying cause. So if anything, much like you and Al touched upon in your podcast. There might need to be a bigger movement to shipping recreates to the E instantly, or to have a "team max" like with overagers in the IRL CHL. Possibly also something of a change in how the waiver system works. Because as much as the NHL waiver system is a tire fire that requires 4 tables to figure out if a player is/isn't eligible, and so many niche rules that actual NHL GM's sometimes forget them. It does do one thing right, imo. It gives the team that needs a player first dibs. The current system of "let the 1m old prospect get bombarded by offers" and have them pick. Means that you end up in situations like Miami this year. We have no players, in 1 week all our Dmen except Bo go inactive and a couple forwards too. While other teams are basically full. Wouldn't it make sense if teams got prio on waivers based on how many roster spots they still need to fill? A 1st gen who creates tomorrow will have 1st pairing minutes on Miami, but do they know that? Not necessarily. So having something in the waiver rules similar to the NHLs "worst goes first" rule. But "least goes first" should go a long way to leveling out the roster numbers at least.
  24. I'd listen to that. Pretty sure a lot of people would. Bit late for it to be an Auction item at this point, but if it was I'd chip in.
×
×
  • Create New...