User Name: Phil EASTERN CONFERENCE
(M1) Washington vs (M2) Pittsburgh Winner: Washington # of Games: 6
(A2) Tampa Bay vs (W1) New York Islanders Winner: Tampa Bay # of Games: 6 WESTERN CONFERENCE
(C1) Dallas vs (C2) St. Louis Winner: St. Louis # of Games: 6 Anaheim/Nashville vs (P3) San Jose Winner: San Jose # of Games: 6
Applicant Name:
Phil Knight
Qualifications:
I have done this many times before and am fully invested in the success of this tournament. More importantly though, I have only 23 hours of work scheduled in the month of May so I have a shitton of time to commit myself to these duties.
Catch Phase:
"It's a mistake to think you can solve any major problem with just potatoes."
Actually when I saw this thread posted last night, I yelled out "FIRST".. but didn't bother typing it
(Perhaps this should go in the Cool Story, Bro Thread)
Because it's very hard to be a heavy hitter without accruing lots of PIMs, I think a very slight alteration could be beneficial to the VFHL. I don't think, however that someone who gets 200 hits with 200 PIMS should be getting many more fantasy points than someone who gets 100 hits but only 50 PIMS. Perhaps look into a ratio?
Or do what I dream about: look at the ratio between HITS and HITS TAKEN and do the hitting points based off that.