S56 VHL Awards

[Advantage 2,769]

Just now, jRuutu said:

Sure, but Shankly was not that much better compare to Fook.

But he still was better so he got votes.  How is that hard to understand?

[Advantage 2,769]

Just now, jRuutu said:

Go for it, I´m not going to win it anyways

Cool.  

[jRuutu 2,303]

Just now, ADV said:

But he still was better so he got votes.  How is that hard to understand?

He was not that much better

[Advantage 2,769]

Just now, jRuutu said:

He was not that much better

But he was better so he got the votes.  Done.  Simple.

[jRuutu 2,303]

1 minute ago, ADV said:

But he was better so he got the votes.  Done.  Simple.

Look who is now thinking so black and white

[boubabi 4,725]

17 minutes ago, jRuutu said:

You had, if Shankly gets 4 votes, so should you.

Dont think you get how awards vote. Theres no 2nd vote or pity vote. You vote for the 1st and thats it. Yu wasnt the best in no category and there was no stats that made counter balance his lack of hits/goals/gwg/ pts

[hedgehog337 3,480]

The most funny thing is @Frank doesn't gives a shit about the top GM award. He got his cup that is highest point for a GM and he's happy about that.

 

[Advantage 2,769]

Just now, jRuutu said:

Look who is now thinking so black and white

Im not.  Im explaining the process to a pretty straightforward award.  One guy beat the other in basically every stat.  So he got it.

[jRuutu 2,303]

1 minute ago, boubabi said:

Dont think you get how awards vote. Theres no 2nd vote or pity vote. You vote for the 1st and thats it. Yu wasnt the best in no category and there was no stats that made counter balance his lack of hits/goals/gwg/ pts

Why Shankly got 4 votes and Axelsson only got 4 votes?

[jRuutu 2,303]

2 minutes ago, ADV said:

Im not.  Im explaining the process to a pretty straightforward award.  One guy beat the other in basically every stat.  So he got it.

But Axelsson had to share it with Shankly, not a straightforward award after all

[boubabi 4,725]

2 minutes ago, jRuutu said:

Why Shankly got 4 votes and Axelsson only got 4 votes?

Because now its a matter of interpretation of stats. Axelsson had more points less hits when shankly had more hits less pts

 

There was no case for Yu as other player had better stats than him

[Advantage 2,769]

1 minute ago, jRuutu said:

But Axelsson had to share it with Shankly, not a straightforward award after all

I just mean its generally stat based is all.  

[hedgehog337 3,480]

5 minutes ago, jRuutu said:

Why Shankly got 4 votes and Axelsson only got 4 votes?

 

Points: Axelsson>Shankly

+/-: Shankly>Axelsson

Hits: Shankly>Axelsson

SB: do BoG considering these stats? Idk, but Axelsson>Shankly

Goals: even

 

It's not easy to find a winner here.

Edited October 6, 2017 by hedgehog337

[jRuutu 2,303]

Just now, boubabi said:

Because now its a matter of interpretation of stats. Axelsson had more points less hits when shankly had more hits less pts

 

There was no case for Yu as other player had better stats then him

In similar scenario I ´lost´ an award

 

1 minute ago, ADV said:

I just mean its generally stat based is all.  

Oke, that is fine.  Could maybe add an award for best shutdown/defensive forward as well.

[Advantage 2,769]

Just now, jRuutu said:

In similar scenario I ´lost´ an award

 

Oke, that is fine.  Could maybe add an award for best shutdown/defensive forward as well.

Based on what stats would you use.  Weve discussed it before.

[jRuutu 2,303]

2 minutes ago, hedgehog337 said:

 

Points: Axelsson>Shankly

+/-: Shankly>Axelsson

Hits: Shankly>Axelsson

SB: do BoG considering these stats? Idk, but Axelsson>Shankly

Goals: even

 

It's not easy to finds a winner here.

No It´s not

[boubabi 4,725]

Just now, jRuutu said:

In similar scenario I ´lost´ an award

 

Oke, that is fine.  Could maybe add an award for best shutdown/defensive forward as well.

Wouldnt be the first human being to lose an award here. If you are confident in your player, you have time to convince that you should win

[jRuutu 2,303]

Just now, ADV said:

Based on what stats would you use.  Weve discussed it before.

Would love to see that, same for defensive defenders also.

[jRuutu 2,303]

Just now, boubabi said:

Wouldnt be the first human being to lose an award here. If you are confident in your player, you have time to convince that you should win

It does not matter what I think about my player when there is 4 people voting for the award.  Who knows what kind of defenders come up next year, this could have been my only change to win it.

[scoop 3,254]

9 minutes ago, boubabi said:

Dont think you get how awards vote. Theres no 2nd vote or pity vote. You vote for the 1st and thats it. Yu wasnt the best in no category and there was no stats that made counter balance his lack of hits/goals/gwg/ pts

He was a center, so he has that going for him. Also had fewer PIM and a higher shooting percentage.

 

 

 

[hedgehog337 3,480]

2 minutes ago, Strtlght said:

Also had fewer PIM

 

Does it even matters?

[Kendrick 4,724]

At this point you are just complaining to see your own posts.

[jRuutu 2,303]

4 minutes ago, Kendrick said:

At this point you are just complaining to see your own posts.

Its true, must admit it felt nice to see 3 of my last posts in threads listed under : Popular now title on top of the VHL front page

[boubabi 4,725]

14 minutes ago, jRuutu said:

It does not matter what I think about my player when there is 4 people voting for the award.  Who knows what kind of defenders come up next year, this could have been my only change to win it.

There will probably have an extension for people to vote so theres that

[Kendrick 4,724]

Just now, jRuutu said:

Its true, must admit it felt nice to see 3 of my last posts in threads listed under : Popular now title on top of the VHL front page

Might be nice, doesn't bode well for future debates though.