The concept of the Jake Wylde Trophy, the league's best “defensive” defenceman is one I argued against for many years – the reasoning being that hits and shot blocks were already taken into account in the Sterling Labatte Trophy discussion, so all an additional trophy would do is 1) muddy the waters and 2) reward mediocre players lucky enough to be on crap teams.
Sadly, I wasn't here to apply this logic in S58 when the trophy was actually forced into its hopefully short existence. Based on its 3-season history, hits and shot blocks are used as the defining metric for the Wylde, with the Labatte being watered down to effectively the highest-scoring defenceman (this was often the case before but with consideration for hits and SBs). The results, as I suspected, leave a lot to be desired.
The first winner of the Wylde in S59 was Fabio Jokinen, who shockingly had won the last proper Labatte in S58. What's more, the winner of the “new” Labatte was Ay Ay Ron...... who had better defensive stats than Jokinen too.
S59 stats:
Ay Ay Ron
Fabio Jokinen
100 points, 255 hits, 114 shot blocks
90 points, 217 hits, 156 shot blocks
How one of these can be called 'best offensive' or 'best defensive' defenceman is beyond me. In the past, the Labatte would have deservedly gone to Ron without a glorified runner-up trophy for Jokinen.
Peculiarly, in S61, the roles were reversed. Ay Ay Ron led all defencemen in points, and even won the Beketov Trophy with 91 assists..... but was dubbed the best defensive defenceman?
S61 stats:
Ay Ay Ron
Mats Johnsson
102 points, 238 hits, 140 shot blocks
95 points, 137 hits, 127 shot blocks
It's fair enough to say Ron was better defensively than Johnsson but surely also offensively?
Meanwhile in S60, the Wylde went to Dexter Lane, a 42-point player with marginally better hits and shot blocks than Ay Ay Ron. It appears that indeed the Wylde was created for the Dexter Lanes of the world and to make inexplicable decisions between defencemen who would have previously been competing for the same trophy.
This was meant to be the introductory rant before the main course which is the actual name of the Jake Wylde Trophy. Jake Wylde is a Hall of Fame defenceman who played between S38 and S45. He won two Labatte Trophies, so there is no indication he was overlooked for higher-scoring defencemen which appears to be the point of the trophy named after him. In fact, he too won the Beketov in one of his Labatte-winning seasons, therefore was very much a member of the elite. But perhaps by digging deeper, I can see that Wylde would have won many more trophies had an equivalent of the Wylde existed in his time.
Disclaimer: I will make an attempt to do so but its accuracy can not be guaranteed, considering I can't figure out the logic of 2 of the 3 winners of the award to date. Nonetheless, let's have a look.
Season 38
Conner Low
92 points
243 hits
134 shot blocks
Godavari Yumalatopinto
94 points
385 hits
215 shot blocks
Matt Bentley
100 points
208 hits
115 shot blocks
Jake Wylde
60 points
278 hits
170 shot blocks
Rookie seasons and all, so it would be unreasonable to expect Wylde to win anything off the bat. It is interesting however to look at the 3 top defencemen of the time. Low and Yumalatopinto ended up splitting the Labatte between them, but presumably Yumalatopinto would have won the Wylde instead and the Labatte would go to...... Bentley I would guess but based on S61 I am not so sure. In which case, the most decorated defenceman of all time in Conner Low would have not won anything this season. To be fair, that maybe should have happened anyway but either way the Wylde/Labatte split probably wouldn't have helped matters much.
Season 39
Conner Low
92 points
179 hits
86 shot blocks
Edwin Encarnacion
67 points
345 hits
120 shot blocks
Jake Wylde
54 points
275 hits
125 shot blocks
That's a second season of Jake Wylde not winning the Jake Wylde Trophy which would surely go to Encarnacion – the all-time leading defenceman in hits and second in career blocked shots. Considering unlike Wylde, Encarnacion never won a trophy, but would have benefited from a 'Wylde Trophy', perhaps he would have been a more appropriate name for the award....
Season 40
Conner Low
101 points
206 hits
119 shot blocks
Matt Bentley
88 points
236 hits
144 shot blocks
Jerrick Poole
60 points
261 hits
215 shot blocks
Jake Wylde
72 points
263 hits
102 shot blocks
I reckon in a head-to-head between Wylde and Poole, the Wylde would go to.... Poole. However, I'd also argue for Bentley (obviously) given the recent actual Wylde wins by Ron and Jokinen. Either way, the clusterfuck persists.
Season 41
Matt Bentley
102 points
223 hits
105 shot blocks
Jerrick Poole
84 points
254 hits
187 shot blocks
Jake Wylde
51 points
257 hits
96 shot blocks
Poole is actually doing bits in a way I hadn't even conceived of when I started writing this article. Apparently this is the man the Hall of Fame has been missing the whole time! We're living in a brave new world, so arise Sir James Lefevre, Sir Till Lindemann, and Sir Pablo Escabar. (I'm not rattling off random names, check out the highest-hitting defencemen of all-time).
I've also forgotten about Mr. Encarnacion since by this point I think he had more fights than points, but I wouldn't be surprised if he would also be in the 'Wylde' conversation here.
Season 42
Matt Bentley
108 points
214 hits
106 shot blocks
Jack Kowalski
77 points
244 hits
167 shot blocks
Jake Wylde
64 points
240 hits
106 shot blocks
I can't.... I can't believe it. I'm not even trying, one scroll through the season index and I find a more worthy winner of the 'most defensive' award. For those keeping count, this is now FIVE seasons into Jake Wylde's career that Jake Wylde has not won the Jake Wylde Trophy. I knew this award was deeply flawed but my expectations have been completely exceeded.
Season 43
This was Wylde's first Labatte Trophy season as he got 103 points, 255 hits, and 90 blocked shots. Perhaps he would have even won the Wylde this season, but then the whole Ron/Jokinen, Ron/Johnsson dilemma above suggests this is somehow taboo and the awards committee would have found someone else to award one of the trophies to.
Season 44
Similar to above, except I think Escobar's 330 hits and 271 shot blocks would have given him the Wylde win. So Wylde would have to make do with the Labatte.... which he won anyway.
Season 45
Jake Wylde
64 points
206 hits
100 shot blocks
Jerrick Poole
62 points
248 hits
149 shot blocks
Jack Kowalski
79 points
281 hits
126 shot blocks
The Labatte this season went to Lloyd Light by the way, but I wanted to focus on these fine gentlemen. Whether you prefer Poole or Kowalski, there is no way Wylde is named better defensively than them. That means that the maximum amount of Wyldes that Wylde could have won if Wyldes existed when Wylde played hockey is..... 1. Even that is debatable because it was in the same year as his actual Labatte. Meanwhile, the completely unheralded Poole and Kowalski probably have won 2 each. That is actually farcical and exactly why this trophy should have always remained locked away, far from the public eye.
I appreciate the intentions behind the Jake Wylde Trophy and understand that there is little recognition for defencemen other than one trophy winner per year (plus potentially playoff MVP and most assists, and in Guntis Petenis' case, a miraculous Campbell/Slobo double). However, the Wylde Trophy doesn't resolve anything, but simply rewards players who either 1) are fine without it , i.e. have their Labattes and Hall of Fame tickets stamped anyway or 2) aren't that good in the first place.
If we want more opportunities for defencemen recognition (and indeed all positions), I propose a proper VHL All-Star Team made up of 3F, 2D, 1G (+ a second one if you want), voted on by the awards committee, with TPE attached to it. After all, 2 TPE for awards isn't that much these days so we can definitely spare some more. The Jake Wylde Trophy though..... needs to go. We kept around silly awards like the Virkkunen and Jonsson for way too long and shouldn't make the same mistake again.