Kendrick

I am hoping too, it gets boring after awhile talking about the same guys haha

Oh well hello there! Last season's prospects have come and gone to their respective VHL squads and we have a new bunch roaring through. However, this year we only have twelve prospects from the get go. As we wait for more to join we might as well meet the twelve we have currently. Now usually we meet them all but it turns out a couple have already gone missing so we decided to give them some limelight later in our ranking editions. Tons of storylines despite the long number of prospects and that will be cool to see later in the season. After seeing two highly competitive drafts in the past, this one is somewhat of a downer for our writers as scouting comes easy with low numbers. Let's get to some introductions though!

Back 2 Back goose eggs for Callum. Nice work! GG Bears

It's alright your roster is improving anyways. GG Legion

That's so not true. Their are boots on the ground over there, albeit not in as large of numbers as one would think to fight them. However, the groups that are fighting them aren't no mickey mouse club.

Claimed

Claimed

Claimed

Claimed

Fuckin hell boyyys

Just squeaked it by. GG Smarchy

For the record I had no issues with it. I just thought the number seemed quite high considering I'd never taken a look at losses on players from Depreciation. But I have noted this.

So basically Burrows shits rainbows? This is the same guy who bit another player, struck a 19 year old in the face in a ball hockey game and is regarded as a guy who can lose it at times on the ice? I'm not saying Burrows is a bad person but you are crediting Jason Botchford (Vancouver's least respected journalist behind Tony Gallagher) for writing a piece saying Burrows is an angel. Tootoo by no means is the NHL's Mother Theresa (I don't want him on my team) but I'm not going to have Jason Botchford influence my opinion on anything besides which Vancouver restaurant has the best egg salad. Come on now. I never said Burrows was an angel. I said I agree with Botchford, and that I believe Burrows over Tootoo. I believe it because if it is as fucking bad as Tootoo is making it out to be, then he needs to say what Burrows said. "Half-assing it isn't fair to anyone", otherwise he's just covering for the fact he came off the bench to start a fight as far as I'm concerned. "Half-assing it"? If I was Jordin Tootoo I wouldn't say what Burrows said either, whatever it was it stays between those two. However, whatever it was wasn't all that pleasant so I don't think it needs to be said. Like I said, you're backing a man who has countless offences when it comes to "class". Backing a coward like Burrows solely because he has done some nice things in the past doesn't mean he is always a victim when someone accuses him of something. This whole thing is stupid, Burrows must have said something because whatever it was irked Tootoo to the point where he went out of his way to get involved with Burrows. If Burrows didn't say anything, Tootoo would have no reason too. Doesn't matter in the end as the Canucks lost the game and still suck the big dick. Clearly it isn't that big of a deal because the NHL has done nothing. All they did is remind Burrows that the mics could pick up what was said. Burrows has stated multiple times that it had nothing to do with Tootoo's substance issues or his brother's passing. So again, what the fuck is it he said? Tootoo just dropped a god damn bomb and let people speculate. That's shittier than anything Burrows did in this incident. I love how you're trying so hard to portray Burrows as the villain, did he do something to you personally? No, but I could say the same to you. You are trying so hard to make it seem like he is an angel just because you follow what Botchford says haha I never said he was an angel. I'm saying I agree with Botchford's sentiments that Tootoo was blowing his top over nothing. Burrows will say a lot of shit, but I believe he's not someone who would make comments on a suicide or race issues. Alcohol was a little debatable, because he has gone after other players for their substance issues. I'm not the one running around calling people "coward" or "scum" either. Grow the fuck up. Over with now. I just feel backing a guy simply for being a fan of the team is outside morals.

4-2 CGY

[:hel:] [:nya:] [:dav:] [:col:]

Sounds like my fantasy football team. No Romo, No Charlies, No Dion Lewis and T.Y. Hilton has always been questionable.

Fuck this mumbo jumbo. GG Expressos

Gotta limit their chances next time. GG Wrags

So basically Burrows shits rainbows? This is the same guy who bit another player, struck a 19 year old in the face in a ball hockey game and is regarded as a guy who can lose it at times on the ice? I'm not saying Burrows is a bad person but you are crediting Jason Botchford (Vancouver's least respected journalist behind Tony Gallagher) for writing a piece saying Burrows is an angel. Tootoo by no means is the NHL's Mother Theresa (I don't want him on my team) but I'm not going to have Jason Botchford influence my opinion on anything besides which Vancouver restaurant has the best egg salad. Come on now. I never said Burrows was an angel. I said I agree with Botchford, and that I believe Burrows over Tootoo. I believe it because if it is as fucking bad as Tootoo is making it out to be, then he needs to say what Burrows said. "Half-assing it isn't fair to anyone", otherwise he's just covering for the fact he came off the bench to start a fight as far as I'm concerned. "Half-assing it"? If I was Jordin Tootoo I wouldn't say what Burrows said either, whatever it was it stays between those two. However, whatever it was wasn't all that pleasant so I don't think it needs to be said. Like I said, you're backing a man who has countless offences when it comes to "class". Backing a coward like Burrows solely because he has done some nice things in the past doesn't mean he is always a victim when someone accuses him of something. This whole thing is stupid, Burrows must have said something because whatever it was irked Tootoo to the point where he went out of his way to get involved with Burrows. If Burrows didn't say anything, Tootoo would have no reason too. Doesn't matter in the end as the Canucks lost the game and still suck the big dick. Clearly it isn't that big of a deal because the NHL has done nothing. All they did is remind Burrows that the mics could pick up what was said. Burrows has stated multiple times that it had nothing to do with Tootoo's substance issues or his brother's passing. So again, what the fuck is it he said? Tootoo just dropped a god damn bomb and let people speculate. That's shittier than anything Burrows did in this incident. I love how you're trying so hard to portray Burrows as the villain, did he do something to you personally? No, but I could say the same to you. You are trying so hard to make it seem like he is an angel just because you follow what Botchford says haha

Congrats you 3!

You're just under 500 words. If you find yourself near a computer in the near future try to pump some more words out, add some pictures/graphics and pros & cons. Here is an overview: http://www.vhlforum.com/index.php?/topic/15247-rookie-profile-rubric/

Yeah yeah move along son, new generation is coming.

Nicely done! (As in recreating) Good luck!

I agree to a point, but if you don't like them just unfollow the people. If it ticks you off that much that is. It is your right to hate seeing stuff like that, it is their right to share what they feel is important. It doesn't make you any less of an individual and it doesn't make them any less of an individual. Much like how it is your opinion, it is also their opinion as well that it matters. It's free will to choose what you find yourself agreeing with whether it's on social media or life, but just know you have to pick and choose where you can pipe up and say things and where you can't. I won't go to a battered women's shelter and start talking about how terrible rape is; because although those women probably agree, it's not what they want to hear at that moment. It may not deserve the attention it gets, but once again that is just your opinion and not something shared collectively upon man kind.

So do I, it's just hypocritical (for most person). If they want to follow the mass, good for them. Not exactly. You are implying someone changing their avatar on Facebook is basically lying to the masses that they care about these things. I know plenty of people who actually didn't know about the other attacks elsewhere. It's not that they selectively went blind to them, but they just didn't have the news flash up in their face. Following the masses is harsh. That's finding a negative in a movement that people do want to help out in whatever way they can. If an avatar bugs people, they may need to rethink their attachment to social media.