Jump to content

Banackock

VHL GM
  • Posts

    21,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    120

Everything posted by Banackock

  1. if this was SHL, there'd be 48672 posts in here saying "Where's the sim??!?!?!" Thank god we inactive
  2. Same but positivity
  3. Miss him
  4. Maroon is heavily overrated. Great passionate player but spends 85% of the time with his hands up in the air because he missed an opportunity or he's crying to the refs. Take away McDavid and he's a 3rd liner on any other contending team..
  5. Player Name: Aleksei Federov VHL Team: Da Bears Cash you have: 7.75M Purchase Name: Positional Change Cost of Purchase: 3M Cash Left: 4.75 Defense to RW.
  6. It was an off-season which seen the blue team running around with their noodles chopped off, people scrambling to get everything going and a couple solid trades and a draft for the general managers. For the players, they were left shuffling, moving and mostly - skipping for joy as a handsome payout was given to them all thanks to the brand new update scale. Well, actually, most people were skipping around for joy. As well all know by know, the Bears lost to Riga last year in the finals and that left a sour taste in the mouths of the Seattle Bears but none more so than Vernon Von Axelberry. Sure, it was shitty to lose and it's any teams goal at the start of the season, but he got fucked in more ways than one. 1. We're not sure if it was defense missing or he just sorta played like shit from time to time. We're going to knock it up to both - defense being overworked, the team not playing great in both ends from time to time and Vernon Von Axelberry turning into Von Axelshitty. Either way, the loss hurts hard for him and usually tends to when youre a goalie. 2. Where are my fucking votes? He got shafted harder than Madison Ivy - boy, did he ever. Okay, maybe he wasn't the best goalie, but fuck son - not even on the ballot. And hey, Kendrick, before you cry to the wah police about biased talk and all that special jizzm that comes outta your squalker, know that I owe a debt to Robbie and am only trying to rile you up. Que the comment in 3... 2... 1... But really, the poor lad wasn't even on the little votes - not a single soul voted for him. In fact, Moon got a vote and while stellar play (maybe), he was on a shit team imo. Poor little Robbin goes home without a vote. @BluObieZlazy huh and got financing shit to do when my woman returns the Mac for me. +2 to Forsberg
  7. Never have been
  8. Amen
  9. becuz of ur review. dont review but yes.. bring back player 2.
  10. Little of both tbh.
  11. Why are you commenting on your own shit? @BluObieZ stick to one account. I can't lose my goalie.
  12. 1st one is Devise FYI. Can barely read the name @BluObieZ or maybe I've drank too much
  13. You're right. Positivity power all the way! I do do believe in Santa.. I don't believe in Santa.. I do, I do.
  14. Robbie 2.0 inb4 multi
  15. But two magazines isn't a good idea.. I love the VHLM.. but 90% of the league doesn't give a fuck about it.. so if they don't pay attention to the league, why would they a magazine? Lol
  16. Just got told by someone on welfare who'll likely be inactive in 3 months. Robbie is SLIPPING.
  17. I drafted my guy
  18. I mean, NYA goalie did good too but yeah our special teams are garbage haha if you have a cure let me know
  19. Positivity.
  20. I wouldn't retire my player. I think that's dirty and if that's the case, should be penalized.
  21. So if you had 88 stats (or lower as you're already in your 9th season and getting regressed).. you'll be hit with a 22 attribute loss and be brought down to 66.. a VHLM player. Say you bring it up to 75 that year, you'd lose another 30 thosw numbers wouldn't work. Who would buy it? Lol id say maybe 10% max
  22. Or just extend and regress normally making it harder to fight regression and regression tougher.. geeze lol..
  23. Can't we just throw the old records into a "vault" and start from scratch S60+ with a new records books seeing as records are the biggest concerns right now for people?
  24. no such thing
×
×
  • Create New...