Beketov

Man, we’ve dropped a lot of EU teams haven’t we. Trhe only old team on there that’s NA is Ottawa.

Well it wouldn’t be an indication of straight up activity at that point, moreso just an indicator of GM’s look quickly from info that could be easily pulled.

No points for me but MUCH better than the last game against DC. @SlapshotDragon coming up huge.

Another point, another win. I’ll take it.

Until you actually accept a contract on the portal your player won’t get imported into the sim. It’s just to save us having a pile of retired players and inactive free agents and such being brought in. Your player doesn’t exist until you’ve signed essentially, at which point his ratings will be downloaded and he’ll be created to be added.

If it was a week ago then yes, you should have been in the index and thus in the lines, that would be a question for your GM. However the difference between us and other leagues is daily sims. In stuff like the SBA there’s a few days between sims where players can get created and put in. Because we sim every day there’s no time to do so unless I manually updated the index for every single player created which would mean I’d be doing nothing but. Also as @Jubo07 points out you hadn’t signed your contract until after the sim so there was no way for your player to have been involved because you weren’t on the team yet.

1. Not to sound harsh but you are overreacting to not immediately being in the lines. GM’s can’t put players in the lines until they are created in the sim. Because a lot of players, including yourself I believe, joined after the index was created your players didn’t exist in the sim until I simmed it. Generally speaking expect 1 sim to go by before you hit the lines so that your player can actually be used. 2. This is regular season.

But how would you dictate it? By the rules it’s based on posting, not something the portal can read. Literally every off-season when we set the free agency we have to go through by hand and set all the actives. I get the idea, I’m just not sure what criteria it’s working off of. Maybe if instead of active / inactive it showed their last update week and highlighted it red if it’s been more than like 3 weeks? That would likely be quite easy to code portal side.

Player Name: Robert Sharpe Position: G Do You Want To GM A Team? Nope Lets see if he can avoid getting suspended this time!

Too much TPE being thrown around and inconsistent writing styles / quality.

Eno got a bit behind so we're letting Corco write some to catch us back up. It's still not back to being open.

Arroyo gets his article first. Cast and Thompson:

Maybe I won’t suck and screw myself this time, who knows. F - Mikko Lahtinen @Jubo07 team officially done.

When in doubt I will always use later versions.

D - Brady Stropko Jr @STZ

Season’s gotta start at some point ?

INDEX @VHLM GM You all should know the drill by now. Here's your index, the schedule is set so you can get your lines together. If there are any roster issues please let me know immediately and I'll get them fixed up ideally before the season starts. If not just put a bot or something in your lines and let me know what to do about it. For lines please make sure you always send lines to both rpower22@gmail.com and vhlsim@outlook.com Otherwise, let's have a great season everyone!

Typo on my post. Was meant to be hadn’t, not hasn’t. He has indeed appended it now, just had not done so when I first posted.

He hadn’t appended it yet, I was under the impression he meant more than just rookie designation.

The issue is that everything in the VHL is based off draft year basically. A rule like that would allow goalies to play backup for several seasons, all while massing TPE, without affecting their retirement season or depreciation years. Even if they in play backup for 2 seasons that’s easily a 200 TPE advantage.

To be fair because it’s multiple choice when you go to look for the answer it’s actually only possible one way. I also realized job pay gives me cap and the end of season uncapped is gone so it doesn’t even matter if I get it right or not.

I mean that’s only a little clearer. 50+ could still count 50 or not and “end of S65” still doesn’t indicate whether S65 counts or not.

I haven’t checked if it’s relevant yet but does question 1 count S65 or would it start at 66?

F - Phil Marleau @Jubo07

In other words, so far, @Tagger approved?